From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail202.messagelabs.com (mail202.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.227]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F9D6B01BA for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:45:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C0FC504.6000505@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:44:52 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] slub: replace SLAB_NODE_UNSPECIFIED with NUMA_NO_NODE References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Christoph Lameter wrote: > Sigh. I wish we could have avoided this. Neither name is satisfactory > here. The meaning of -1 is unspecified. A node specification may be > implicit here depending on the memory allocation policy. I was not sure > how exactly to resolve the situation. > > But this way work with NUMA_NO_NODE. Certainly better. > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter Applied, thanks! -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org