From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@codeaurora.org>,
mel@csn.ul.ie, andi@firstfloor.org, dwalker@codeaurora.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] mm: iommu: The Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:48:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C2D0D2D.8090407@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007011450130.13691@utopia.booyaka.com>
On 07/01/10 13:59, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Randy,
>
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>>> + * @start_addr The starting address of the VCM region.
>>> + * @len The len of the VCM region. This must be at least
>>> + * vcm_min() bytes.
>>
>> and missing lots of struct members here.
>> If some of them are private, you can use:
>>
>> /* private: */
>> ...
>> /* public: */
>> comments in the struct below and then don't add the private ones to the
>> kernel-doc notation above.
>
> To avoid wasting space in structures, it makes sense to place fields
> smaller than the alignment width together in the structure definition.
> If one were to do this and follow your proposal, some structures may need
> multiple "private" and "public" comments, which seems undesirable. The
> alternative, wasting memory, also seems undesirable. Perhaps you might
> have a proposal for a way to resolve this?
I don't know of a really good way. There are a few structs that have
multiple private/public entries, and that is OK.
Or you can describe all of the entries with kernel-doc notation.
Or you can choose not to use kernel-doc notation on some structs.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-01 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 5:55 [RFC 1/3] mm: iommu: An API to unify IOMMU, CPU and device memory management Zach Pfeffer
2010-06-30 5:55 ` [RFC 2/3] mm: iommu: A physical allocator for the VCMM Zach Pfeffer
2010-06-30 5:55 ` [RFC 3/3] mm: iommu: The Virtual Contiguous Memory Manager Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-01 17:17 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-07-01 18:02 ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-01 19:28 ` Daniel Walker
2010-07-01 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-01 19:42 ` Daniel Walker
2010-07-01 22:15 ` Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-02 7:09 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-10 14:36 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-07-13 5:21 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-14 19:34 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-07-15 1:18 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-01 22:00 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-01 22:05 ` Daniel Walker
2010-07-02 7:33 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-10 14:56 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-07-13 5:46 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-13 5:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-13 8:20 ` Alan Cox
2010-07-13 8:30 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-13 8:42 ` Alan Cox
2010-07-13 8:45 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-13 9:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-14 1:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-22 3:50 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-22 4:47 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-22 16:33 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-22 7:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 16:13 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-13 12:06 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-01 22:51 ` Hari Kanigeri
2010-07-02 7:29 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-01 23:00 ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-02 6:17 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-02 8:22 ` Andi Kleen
2010-07-02 18:42 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-10 15:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-07-13 5:52 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-03 6:36 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-10 14:54 ` Joerg Roedel
2010-07-13 5:27 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-01 20:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2010-07-01 21:48 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2010-06-30 23:40 ` [RFC 1/3] mm: iommu: An API to unify IOMMU, CPU and device memory management Randy Dunlap
2010-07-01 7:16 ` Zach Pfeffer
2010-07-02 7:00 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C2D0D2D.8090407@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=zpfeffer@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).