From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234E76B02A3 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:46:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C3DA38A.7010003@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:46:18 +0200 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR References: <20100709190706.938177313@quilx.com> <20100710195621.GA13720@fancy-poultry.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Heinz Diehl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin , David Rientjes List-ID: Hello, On 07/12/2010 05:11 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > You need a sufficient PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE to be configured. What > platform is this? Tejon: You suggested the BUILD_BUG_ON(). How can he > increase the early size? The size is determined by PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE, so bumping it up should do it but it would probably be wiser to bump PERCPU_DYNAMIC_RESERVE too. PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE is currently 12k. How high should it be? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org