From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A306B02A4 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:51:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C3DA4B9.1060206@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:51:21 +0200 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [S+Q2 00/19] SLUB with queueing (V2) beats SLAB netperf TCP_RR References: <20100709190706.938177313@quilx.com> <20100710195621.GA13720@fancy-poultry.org> <20100712163900.GA8513@fancy-poultry.org> <20100713135650.GA6444@fancy-poultry.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Heinz Diehl , Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin , David Rientjes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, On 07/14/2010 04:01 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > I dont see anything in there at first glance that would cause slub to > increase its percpu usage. This is straight upstream? It's basically checking constant expressions there and PERCPU_DYNAMIC_EARLY_SIZE is defined as 12k, so slub is thinking that it's gonna use more memory on that build. > Try to just comment out the BUILD_BUG_ON. I had it misfire before and > fixed the formulae to no longer give false positives. Maybe that is > another case. Tejun wanted that but never was able to give me an exact > formular to check for. Yeah, unfortunately, due to alignment requirements, it can't be determined with accuracy. We'll just have to size it sufficiently. > At the Ottawa Linux Symposium right now so responses may be delayed. > Hotels Internet connection keeps getting clogged for some reason. I'm in suse labs conf until next week so I don't think I'll be doing much till then either. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org