From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christian Dietrich <stettberger@dokucode.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dead Config in mm/percpu.c
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:12:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C470E69.7020900@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <861vaxjij8.fsf@peer.zerties.org>
On 07/21/2010 11:22 AM, Christian Dietrich wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> As part of the VAMOS[0] research project at the University of
> Erlangen we are looking at multiple integrity errors in linux'
> configuration system.
>
> I've been running a check on the mm/ sourcetree for
> config Items not defined in Kconfig and found 1 such case. Sourcecode
> blocks depending on these Items are not reachable from a vanilla
> kernel -- dead code. I've seen such dead blocks made on purpose
> e.g. while integrating new features into the kernel but generally
> they're just useless.
>
> We found, that CONFIG_NEED_PER_CPU_KM is a dead symbol, so it isn't defined
> anywhere. Cause of that the percpu_km.c is never included anywhere. Is
> this a intended dead symbol, for use in out of tree development, or is
> this just an error?
Oh, it's new code waiting to be used. It's for cases where SMP is
used w/o MMU. IIRC, it was blackfin.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-21 9:22 Dead Config in mm/percpu.c Christian Dietrich
2010-07-21 15:12 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-08-10 6:26 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C470E69.7020900@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=stettberger@dokucode.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).