linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, tj@kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [S+Q 09/16] [percpu] make allocpercpu usable during early boot
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 12:39:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C53EF3D.4020403@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1007060926220.3627@router.home>

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
>>> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>>>> +               return kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL & gfp_allowed_mask);
>>>>>        else {
>>>>>                void *ptr = vmalloc(size);
>>>>>                if (ptr)
>>>> This looks wrong to me. All slab allocators should do gfp_allowed_mask
>>>> magic under the hood. Maybe it's triggering kmalloc_large() path that
>>>> needs the masking too?
>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Christoph Lameter
>> <cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>> They do gfp_allowed_mask magic. But the checks at function entry of the
>>> slabs do not mask the masks so we get false positives without this. All my
>>> protest against the checks doing it this IMHO broken way were ignored.
>> Which checks are those? Are they in SLUB proper or are they introduced
>> in one of the SLEB patches? We definitely don't want to expose
>> gfp_allowed_mask here.
> 
> Argh. The reason for the trouble here is because I moved the
> masking of the gfp flags out of the hot path.
> 
> The masking of the bits adds to the cache footprint of the hotpaths now in
> all slab allocators. Gosh. Why is there constant contamination of the hot
> paths with the stuff?

We should definitely move gfp_allowed_mask masking out of fast-paths. I 
think the ideal solution is to only do it deep in the page allocator.

> We only need this masking in the hot path if the debugging hooks need it.
> Otherwise its fine to defer this to the slow paths.
> 
> So how do I get that in there? Add "& gfp_allowed_mask" to the gfp mask
> passed to the debugging hooks?
> 
> Or add a debug_hooks_alloc() function and make it empty if no debugging
> functions are enabled?

I think it's best to have separate debugging hooks that are empty if 
debugging is disabled, yes.

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-31  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-25 21:20 [S+Q 00/16] SLUB with Queueing beats SLAB in hackbench Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 01/16] [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Bugfix for semop() not reporting successful operation Christoph Lameter
2010-06-28  2:17   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-28 16:45     ` Manfred Spraul
2010-06-28 23:58       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-28 16:48   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-06-29 15:42     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-29 19:08       ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-30 19:38         ` Manfred Spraul
2010-06-30 19:51           ` Andrew Morton
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 02/16] [PATCH 1/2] percpu: make @dyn_size always mean min dyn_size in first chunk init functions Christoph Lameter
2010-06-27  5:06   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-27  8:21     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-27 16:57       ` [S+Q 02/16] [PATCH 1/2 UPDATED] " Tejun Heo
2010-06-27 19:25         ` David Rientjes
2010-06-27 19:24       ` [S+Q 02/16] [PATCH 1/2] " David Rientjes
2010-06-29 15:36     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 03/16] [PATCH 2/2] percpu: allow limited allocation before slab is online Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 04/16] slub: Use a constant for a unspecified node Christoph Lameter
2010-06-28  2:25   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-29 15:38     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 05/16] SLUB: Constants need UL Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26 23:31   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-28  2:27   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 06/16] slub: Use kmem_cache flags to detect if slab is in debugging mode Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26 23:31   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 07/16] slub: discard_slab_unlock Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26 23:34   ` David Rientjes
2010-07-06 20:44     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 08/16] slub: remove dynamic dma slab allocation Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26 23:52   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-29 15:31     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-28  2:33   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-29 15:41     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-30  0:26       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 09/16] [percpu] make allocpercpu usable during early boot Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26  8:10   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-26 23:53     ` David Rientjes
2010-06-29 15:15     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-29 15:30       ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-06 20:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26 23:38   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-29 15:26     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-28 17:03   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-06-29 15:45     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-01  6:23       ` Pekka Enberg
2010-07-06 14:32         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-07-31  9:39           ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 10/16] slub: Remove static kmem_cache_cpu array for boot Christoph Lameter
2010-06-27  0:02   ` David Rientjes
2010-06-29 15:35     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 11/16] slub: Dynamically size kmalloc cache allocations Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 12/16] SLUB: Add SLAB style per cpu queueing Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26  2:32   ` Nick Piggin
2010-06-28 10:19     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 13/16] SLUB: Resize the new cpu queues Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 14/16] SLUB: Get rid of useless function count_free() Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 15/16] SLUB: Remove MAX_OBJS limitation Christoph Lameter
2010-06-25 21:20 ` [S+Q 16/16] slub: Drop allocator announcement Christoph Lameter
2010-06-26  2:24 ` [S+Q 00/16] SLUB with Queueing beats SLAB in hackbench Nick Piggin
2010-06-28  6:18   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-06-28 10:12     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-28 15:18       ` Pekka Enberg
2010-06-28 18:54         ` David Rientjes
2010-06-29 15:23           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-29 15:55             ` Mike Travis
2010-06-29 15:21         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-28 14:46     ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C53EF3D.4020403@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).