From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6773B60020C for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:26:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C5AD823.8020004@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:26:27 -0400 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] vmscan: synchrounous lumpy reclaim use lock_page() instead trylock_page() References: <20100805150624.31B7.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100805151304.31C0.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20100805151304.31C0.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: LKML , linux-mm , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Wu Fengguang , Minchan Kim List-ID: On 08/05/2010 02:13 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > When synchrounous lumpy reclaim, there is no reason to give up to > reclaim pages even if page is locked. We use lock_page() instead > trylock_page() in this case. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Acked-by: Rik van Riel -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org