From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: don't flush TLB when propagate PTE access bit to struct page.
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:05:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC869F5.2070405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1288200090-23554-1-git-send-email-yinghan@google.com>
On 10/27/2010 01:21 PM, Ying Han wrote:
> kswapd's use case of hardware PTE accessed bit is to approximate page LRU. The
> ActiveLRU demotion to InactiveLRU are not base on accessed bit, while it is only
> used to promote when a page is on inactive LRU list. All of the state transitions
> are triggered by memory pressure and thus has weak relationship with respect to
> time. In addition, hardware already transparently flush tlb whenever CPU context
> switch processes and given limited hardware TLB resource, the time period in
> which a page is accessed but not yet propagated to struct page is very small
> in practice. With the nature of approximation, kernel really don't need to flush TLB
> for changing PTE's access bit. This commit removes the flush operation from it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>
> Singed-off-by: Ken Chen<kenchen@google.com>
The reasoning behind the patch makes sense.
However, have you measured any improvements in run time with
this patch? The VM is already tweaked to minimize the number
of pages that get aged, so it would be interesting to know
where you saw issues.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-27 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-27 17:21 [PATCH] mm: don't flush TLB when propagate PTE access bit to struct page Ying Han
2010-10-27 18:05 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2010-10-27 18:22 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-27 18:37 ` Nick Piggin
2010-10-27 19:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-10-27 20:35 ` Ying Han
2010-10-28 0:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-29 1:30 ` Ken Chen
2010-10-29 2:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-29 3:43 ` Rik van Riel
2010-10-29 4:27 ` Minchan Kim
2010-10-29 12:31 ` Rik van Riel
2010-10-29 13:03 ` Minchan Kim
2010-10-29 13:15 ` Rik van Riel
2010-10-30 0:20 ` Minchan Kim
2010-10-27 20:19 ` Ying Han
2010-10-28 11:53 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC869F5.2070405@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).