From: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
To: michal.simek@petalogix.com
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com>,
"Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: Flushing whole page instead of exact address for ptrace
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:07:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF4DAE7.1040107@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CEFA8AE.2090804@petalogix.com>
Hi,
Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found one problem when I debug multithread application on
> Microblaze. Let me describe what I discovered.
>
> GDB has internal timeout which is setup to value 3. Which should mean if
> GDB sends packet and doesn't receive answer for it then after 3 internal
> timeouts GDB announces "Ignoring packet error, continuing..." and then
> fail. (communication is done over TCP).
>
> In any older version we could debug multithread application that's why
> I bisected all new patches which I have added to the kernel and I
> identify that the problem is caused by my patch.
>
> microblaze: Implement flush_dcache_page macro
> sha1(79e87830faf22ca636b1a1d8f4deb430ea6e1c8b)
>
> I had to implemented flush_dcache_page macro for new systems with
> write-back(WB) cache which is important for several components (for
> example jffs2 rootfs) to get it work on WB.
> BTW: For systems with write-through(WT) caches I don't need to implement
> this macro because flushing is done automatically.
>
> Then I replaced macro on WT by udelay loop to find out if the problem is
> time dependent. I tested it on two hw designs(on the same HZ and cache
> size) with two different network IPs/drivers (one with DMA and second
> without) and I found that system with dma network driver can spend more
> time on dcache flushing before GDB timeout happens because TCP
> communication is faster. Which means that the problem also depends on
> cpu speed and cache configuration - size, cache line length.
>
> Then I traced kernel part and I was focused why this macro is causing
> this problem.
>
> GDB sends symbol-lookup command (qSymbol) and I see a lot of kernel
> ptrace PEEKTEXT requests. I parse it and here is calling sequence.
>
> (kernel/ptrace.c) sys_ptrace ->
> (arch/microblaze/kernel/ptrace.c)arch_ptrace ->
> (kernel/ptrace.c)ptrace_request -> generic_ptrace_peek/poke data/text ->
> (mm/memory.c) access_process_vm -> get_user_pages -> __get_user_pages ->
> flush_dcache_page
>
> Function access_process_vm calls __get_user_pages which doesn't work
> with buffer len (which is for PEEK/POKE TEXT/DATA just 32 bit - for
> 32bit Microblaze) but only with start and PAGE size. There is also
> called flush_dcache_page macro which takes more time than in past,
> because was empty. Macro flushes whole page but it is necessary, for
> this case, just flush one address if is called from ptrace.
>
> What is the best way how to ensure that there will be flush only address
> instead of whole page for ptrace requests?
> I think that there shouldn't be a reason to flush whole page for ptraces.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong somewhere.
Any suggestions?
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-30 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-26 12:31 Flushing whole page instead of work for ptrace Michal Simek
2010-11-30 11:07 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2010-11-30 23:32 ` Roland McGrath
2010-12-01 17:10 ` Michal Simek
2010-12-01 17:57 ` David Miller
2010-12-03 15:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-03 16:28 ` Minchan Kim
2010-12-03 17:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-04 14:57 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF4DAE7.1040107@monstr.eu \
--to=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=edgar.iglesias@gmail.com \
--cc=john.williams@petalogix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=michal.simek@petalogix.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).