linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
	"缪 勰" <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist()
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:22:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5DD7F9.30202@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsj4OagOQhaPL=6-3awQo9ssh06NgwTg1kOsYh@mail.gmail.com>

Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> It's not necessary to copy cpuset->mems_allowed to a buffer
>> allocated by NODEMASK_ALLOC(). Just pass it to nodelist_scnprintf().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
> 
> The only downside is that we're now doing more work (and more complex
> work) inside callback_mutex, but I guess that's OK compared to having
> to do a memory allocation. (I poked around in lib/vsprintf.c and I
> couldn't see any cases where it might allocate memory, but it would be
> particularly bad if there was any way to trigger an Oops.)
> 
>> ---
>>  kernel/cpuset.c |   10 +---------
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> index 10f1835..f13ff2e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> @@ -1620,20 +1620,12 @@ static int cpuset_sprintf_cpulist(char *page, struct cpuset *cs)
>>
>>  static int cpuset_sprintf_memlist(char *page, struct cpuset *cs)
>>  {
>> -       NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, mask, GFP_KERNEL);
>>        int retval;
>>
>> -       if (mask == NULL)
>> -               return -ENOMEM;
>> -
> 
> And this was particularly broken since the only caller of
> cpuset_sprintf_memlist() doesn't handle a negative error response
> anyway and would then overwrite byte 4083 on the preceding page with a
> '\n'. And then since the (size_t)(s-page) that's passed to
> simple_read_from_buffer() would be a very large number, it would write
> arbitrary (user-controlled) amounts of kernel data to the userspace
> buffer.
> 
> Maybe we could also rename 'retval' to 'count' in this function (and
> cpuset_sprintf_cpulist()) to make it clearer that callers don't expect
> negative error values?
> 

Good spot!

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-18  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-17  1:49 [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Li Zefan
2011-02-17  1:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_attch() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:46   ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18  2:37     ` Li Zefan
2011-02-20  1:51   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17  1:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Fix unchecked calls to NODEMASK_ALLOC() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 22:46   ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-17 23:50     ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18  2:47       ` Li Zefan
2011-02-19  2:28         ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20  1:51   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-21  3:20     ` Li Zefan
2011-02-21  5:30       ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22  0:25       ` David Rientjes
2011-02-22  2:15         ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22 20:30           ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17  1:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuset: Hold callback_mutex in cpuset_clone() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:51   ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20  1:51   ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 23:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Paul Menage
2011-02-18  2:22   ` Li Zefan [this message]
2011-02-20  1:51 ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D5DD7F9.30202@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).