From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
"缪 勰" <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist()
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:22:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5DD7F9.30202@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinsj4OagOQhaPL=6-3awQo9ssh06NgwTg1kOsYh@mail.gmail.com>
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> It's not necessary to copy cpuset->mems_allowed to a buffer
>> allocated by NODEMASK_ALLOC(). Just pass it to nodelist_scnprintf().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
>
> The only downside is that we're now doing more work (and more complex
> work) inside callback_mutex, but I guess that's OK compared to having
> to do a memory allocation. (I poked around in lib/vsprintf.c and I
> couldn't see any cases where it might allocate memory, but it would be
> particularly bad if there was any way to trigger an Oops.)
>
>> ---
>> kernel/cpuset.c | 10 +---------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> index 10f1835..f13ff2e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
>> @@ -1620,20 +1620,12 @@ static int cpuset_sprintf_cpulist(char *page, struct cpuset *cs)
>>
>> static int cpuset_sprintf_memlist(char *page, struct cpuset *cs)
>> {
>> - NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, mask, GFP_KERNEL);
>> int retval;
>>
>> - if (mask == NULL)
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> -
>
> And this was particularly broken since the only caller of
> cpuset_sprintf_memlist() doesn't handle a negative error response
> anyway and would then overwrite byte 4083 on the preceding page with a
> '\n'. And then since the (size_t)(s-page) that's passed to
> simple_read_from_buffer() would be a very large number, it would write
> arbitrary (user-controlled) amounts of kernel data to the userspace
> buffer.
>
> Maybe we could also rename 'retval' to 'count' in this function (and
> cpuset_sprintf_cpulist()) to make it clearer that callers don't expect
> negative error values?
>
Good spot!
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-18 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-17 1:49 [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 1:49 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_attch() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:46 ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18 2:37 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 1:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuset: Fix unchecked calls to NODEMASK_ALLOC() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 22:46 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-17 23:50 ` Paul Menage
2011-02-18 2:47 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-19 2:28 ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-21 3:20 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-21 5:30 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22 0:25 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-22 2:15 ` Li Zefan
2011-02-22 20:30 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 1:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuset: Hold callback_mutex in cpuset_clone() Li Zefan
2011-02-17 23:51 ` Paul Menage
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
2011-02-17 23:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpuset: Remove unneeded NODEMASK_ALLOC() in cpuset_sprintf_memlist() Paul Menage
2011-02-18 2:22 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2011-02-20 1:51 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5DD7F9.30202@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).