Re: [PATCH 6/8] Add __GFP_OTHER_NODE flag

[Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>]

On 2/22/2011 1:42 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> This makes the accounting worse, NUMA_LOCAL is defined as "allocation from
> local node," meaning it's local to the allocating cpu, not local to the
> node being targeted.

Local to the process really (and I defined it originally ...)  That is 
what I'm implementing

I don't think "local to some random kernel daemon which changes mappings 
on behalf of others"
makes any sense as semantics.

> Further, preferred_zone has taken on a much more significant meaning other
> than just statistics: it impacts the behavior of memory compaction and how
> long congestion timeouts are, if a timeout is taken at all, depending on
> the I/O being done on behalf of the zone.
>
> A better way to address the issue is by making sure preferred_zone is
> actually correct by using the appropriate zonelist to be passed into the
> allocator in the first place

That is what is done already (well for THP together with my other patches)
The problem is just that local_hit/miss still uses numa_node_id() and 
not the preferred zone
to do the accounting.  In most cases that's fine and intended, just not 
for these
special daemons.


-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>