linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] slub,rcu: don't assume the size of struct rcu_head
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:55:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6DB1BD.60003@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103010909320.6253@router.home>

On 03/01/2011 11:11 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> 
>> The SLAB and SLUB patches are fine by me if there are going to be real
>> users for this. Christoph, Paul?
> 
> The solution is a bit overkill. It would be much simpler to add a union to
> struct page that has lru and the rcu in there similar things can be done
> for SLAB and the network layer. A similar issue already exists for the
> spinlock in struct page. Lets follow the existing way of handling this.

I don't want to impact the whole system too much to
touch struct page. The solution changes existed things little,
and the reversed data may just make use of the pad data.

> 
> Struct page may be larger for debugging purposes already because of the
> need for extended spinlock data.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-01  8:03 [PATCH 2/4] slub,rcu: don't assume the size of struct rcu_head Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-01 13:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-03-01 15:11   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-03-02  2:55     ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2011-03-02  4:31     ` Hugh Dickins
2011-03-02 12:32       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-03-06 19:39         ` Hugh Dickins
2011-03-08  2:17           ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-03-17 15:16           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-03-19  3:58             ` Hugh Dickins
2011-03-08 18:25 ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D6DB1BD.60003@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).