From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Lsf] [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:22:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D924D8C.8060201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110329190520.GJ12265@random.random>
On 03/29/2011 03:05 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Should the latency issues be discussed in that track?
Sounds good. I don't think we'll spend more than 5-10 minutes
on the latency thing, probably less than that.
> The MM schedule has still a free slot 14-14:30 on Monday, I wonder if
> there's interest on a "NUMA automatic migration and scheduling
> awareness" topic or if it's still too vapourware for a real topic and
> we should keep it for offtrack discussions,
I believe that problem is complex enough to warrant a 30
minute discussion. Even if we do not come up with solutions,
it would be a good start if we could all agree on the problem.
Things this complex often end up getting shot down later, not
because people do not agree on the solution, but because people
do not agree on the PROBLEM (and the patches in question only
solve a subset of the problem).
I would be willing to lead the NUMA scheduling and memory
allocation discussion.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-29 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-03-29 15:35 ` [LSF][MM] page allocation & direct reclaim latency Rik van Riel
2011-03-29 19:05 ` [Lsf] " Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:35 ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:39 ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 20:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 20:53 ` Ying Han
2011-03-29 21:22 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2011-03-29 22:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-29 22:13 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-29 23:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-30 16:17 ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-30 16:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31 0:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2011-03-31 15:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-31 9:30 ` Mel Gorman
2011-03-31 16:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-03-30 16:59 ` Dan Magenheimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D924D8C.8060201@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).