Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39

[Brad Campbell <brad@fnarfbargle.com>]

On 03/06/11 23:50, Bernhard Held wrote:
>Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell:
>>On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote:
>>>On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
>>>>Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere
>>>>in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge).
>>>>
>>>>All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses.
>>>
>>>Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host from
>>>going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two
>>>of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the
>>>same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related.
>>
>>Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter &
>>cc'd to kvm,
>>but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to
>>netdev has
>>not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped
>>into the
>>bit bucket also.
>Just another reference 3.5 months ago:
>http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html

<waves hands around shouting "I have a reproducible test case for this 
and don't mind patching and crashing the machine to get it fixed">

Attempted to add netfilter-devel to the cc this time.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>