linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: nai.xia@gmail.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:43:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E01C752.10405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106212132.39311.nai.xia@gmail.com>

On 06/21/2011 04:32 PM, Nai Xia wrote:
> Introduced kvm_mmu_notifier_test_and_clear_dirty(), kvm_mmu_notifier_dirty_update()
> and their mmu_notifier interfaces to support KSM dirty bit tracking, which brings
> significant performance gain in volatile pages scanning in KSM.
> Currently, kvm_mmu_notifier_dirty_update() returns 0 if and only if intel EPT is
> enabled to indicate that the dirty bits of underlying sptes are not updated by
> hardware.
>


Can you quantify the performance gains?

> +int kvm_test_and_clear_dirty_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
> +				   unsigned long data)
> +{
> +	u64 *spte;
> +	int dirty = 0;
> +
> +	if (!shadow_dirty_mask) {
> +		WARN(1, "KVM: do NOT try to test dirty bit in EPT\n");
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL);
> +	while (spte) {
> +		int _dirty;
> +		u64 _spte = *spte;
> +		BUG_ON(!(_spte&  PT_PRESENT_MASK));
> +		_dirty = _spte&  PT_DIRTY_MASK;
> +		if (_dirty) {
> +			dirty = 1;
> +			clear_bit(PT_DIRTY_SHIFT, (unsigned long *)spte);
> +		}

Racy.  Also, needs a tlb flush eventually.

> +		spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
> +	}
> +out:
> +	return dirty;
> +}
> +
>   #define RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD 1000
>
>
>   struct mmu_notifier_ops {
> +	int (*dirty_update)(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> +			     struct mm_struct *mm);
> +

I prefer to have test_and_clear_dirty() always return 1 in this case (if 
the spte is writeable), and drop this callback.
> +int __mmu_notifier_dirty_update(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	struct mmu_notifier *mn;
> +	struct hlist_node *n;
> +	int dirty_update = 0;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n,&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
> +		if (mn->ops->dirty_update)
> +			dirty_update |= mn->ops->dirty_update(mn, mm);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +

Should it not be &= instead?

> +	return dirty_update;
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * This function can't run concurrently against mmu_notifier_register
>    * because mm->mm_users>  0 during mmu_notifier_register and exit_mmap

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-22 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-21 12:55 [PATCH 0/2 V2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid volatile pages scanning Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/2 " Nai Xia
2011-06-21 21:42   ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:02     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:42       ` Chris Wright
2011-06-21 13:32 ` [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:21   ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  4:43     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  6:15     ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22  6:38       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 15:46       ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 10:43   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-06-22 11:05     ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:10       ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:19         ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:24           ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:28             ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:31               ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:33               ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 11:39                 ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 15:39           ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-22 16:55             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 23:37               ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:59                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  0:31                   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:44                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  1:36                       ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23  0:00                 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-23  0:42                   ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:13             ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:25               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  1:30                 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:28               ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-23  0:52                 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 11:24     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 15:03   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 15:19     ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 23:19     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:44       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23  0:14         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:42     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid volatile pages scanning Nai Xia
2011-06-21 22:38   ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  0:04     ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:35       ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22  4:47         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 10:55         ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22  0:46 ` [PATCH 0/2 " Chris Wright
2011-06-22  4:15   ` Nai Xia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E01C752.10405@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nai.xia@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).