From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: nai.xia@gmail.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Izik Eidus <izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:43:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E01C752.10405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201106212132.39311.nai.xia@gmail.com>
On 06/21/2011 04:32 PM, Nai Xia wrote:
> Introduced kvm_mmu_notifier_test_and_clear_dirty(), kvm_mmu_notifier_dirty_update()
> and their mmu_notifier interfaces to support KSM dirty bit tracking, which brings
> significant performance gain in volatile pages scanning in KSM.
> Currently, kvm_mmu_notifier_dirty_update() returns 0 if and only if intel EPT is
> enabled to indicate that the dirty bits of underlying sptes are not updated by
> hardware.
>
Can you quantify the performance gains?
> +int kvm_test_and_clear_dirty_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
> + unsigned long data)
> +{
> + u64 *spte;
> + int dirty = 0;
> +
> + if (!shadow_dirty_mask) {
> + WARN(1, "KVM: do NOT try to test dirty bit in EPT\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, NULL);
> + while (spte) {
> + int _dirty;
> + u64 _spte = *spte;
> + BUG_ON(!(_spte& PT_PRESENT_MASK));
> + _dirty = _spte& PT_DIRTY_MASK;
> + if (_dirty) {
> + dirty = 1;
> + clear_bit(PT_DIRTY_SHIFT, (unsigned long *)spte);
> + }
Racy. Also, needs a tlb flush eventually.
> + spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
> + }
> +out:
> + return dirty;
> +}
> +
> #define RMAP_RECYCLE_THRESHOLD 1000
>
>
> struct mmu_notifier_ops {
> + int (*dirty_update)(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
> + struct mm_struct *mm);
> +
I prefer to have test_and_clear_dirty() always return 1 in this case (if
the spte is writeable), and drop this callback.
> +int __mmu_notifier_dirty_update(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + struct mmu_notifier *mn;
> + struct hlist_node *n;
> + int dirty_update = 0;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(mn, n,&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list, hlist) {
> + if (mn->ops->dirty_update)
> + dirty_update |= mn->ops->dirty_update(mn, mm);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
Should it not be &= instead?
> + return dirty_update;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * This function can't run concurrently against mmu_notifier_register
> * because mm->mm_users> 0 during mmu_notifier_register and exit_mmap
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 12:55 [PATCH 0/2 V2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid volatile pages scanning Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/2 " Nai Xia
2011-06-21 21:42 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 0:02 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 0:42 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-21 13:32 ` [PATCH] mmu_notifier, kvm: Introduce dirty bit tracking in spte and mmu notifier to help KSM dirty bit tracking Nai Xia
2011-06-22 0:21 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 4:43 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 6:15 ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 6:38 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 15:46 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 10:43 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-06-22 11:05 ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:19 ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 11:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:28 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:31 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 11:33 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 11:39 ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 15:39 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-22 16:55 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 23:37 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23 0:31 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23 0:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23 1:36 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-23 0:00 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-23 0:42 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:13 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23 1:30 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:28 ` Rik van Riel
2011-06-23 0:52 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 11:24 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 15:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-22 15:19 ` Izik Eidus
2011-06-22 23:19 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-06-23 0:14 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 23:42 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-21 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] ksm: take dirty bit as reference to avoid volatile pages scanning Nai Xia
2011-06-21 22:38 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 0:04 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 0:35 ` Chris Wright
2011-06-22 4:47 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 10:55 ` Nai Xia
2011-06-22 0:46 ` [PATCH 0/2 " Chris Wright
2011-06-22 4:15 ` Nai Xia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E01C752.10405@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=izik.eidus@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nai.xia@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).