Re: [PATCH 0/2][cleanup] memcg: renaming of mem variable to memcg

[Raghavendra K T <raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 08/11/2011 01:56 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 11-08-11 13:46:19, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> On 08/11/2011 01:23 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 10-08-11 22:59:17, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>   This is the memcg cleanup patch for that was talked little ago to change the  "struct
>>>>   mem_cgroup *mem" variable to  "struct mem_cgroup *memcg".
>>>>
>>>>   The patch is though trivial, it is huge one.
>>>>   Testing : Compile tested with following configurations.
>>>>   1) CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y  CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=y
>>>>   2) CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y  CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=n
>>>>   3) CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=n  CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=n
>>>
>>> How exactly have you tested? Compiled and compared before/after binaries
>>> (it shouldn't change, right)?
>> Yes, But idea was to ensure that both #ifdef and #else part are hit
>> during compilation, which could expose some corrections needed.
>
> I am not sure I understand. You have used different combinations of
> configuration to trigger all #ifdefs but that doesn't change anything on
> the fact that the code should be exactly same before and after your
> patch, right?
>
Yes you are right again. No change in the code after the patch.
It was just to exercise I have not missed any valid changes in both 
paths, and it does not break compilation.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>