From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, mm: start mmap allocation for libs from low addresses
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:17:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E52B96B.8040404@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110822201418.GA3176@albatros>
On 08/22/2011 01:14 PM, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
>
>> Code-wise:
>>
>> The code is horrific; it is full of open-coded magic numbers;
>
> Agreed, the magic needs macro definition and comments.
>
>> it also
>> puts a function called arch_get_unmapped_exec_area() in a generic file,
>> which could best be described as "WTF" -- the arch_ prefix we use
>> specifically to denote a per-architecture hook function.
>
> Agreed. But I'd want to leave it in mm/mmap.c as it's likely be used by
> other archs - the changes are bitness specific, not arch specific. Is
> it OK if I do this?
>
> #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_EXEC_AREA
> void *arch_get_unmapped_exec_area(...)
> {
> ...
> }
> #endif
>
Only if this is really an architecture-specific function overridden in
specific architectures. I'm not so sure that applies here.
Furthermore, I'm not even all that sure what this function *does*.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-12 10:29 [RFC] x86, mm: start mmap allocation for libs from low addresses Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-12 23:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-13 6:26 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-16 9:05 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 10:17 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 17:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-08-22 20:14 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-08-23 6:41 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E52B96B.8040404@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).