From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E959000C6 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:27:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4E89AA01.3000803@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:26:41 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup References: <1317637123-18306-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1317637123-18306-8-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20111003121446.GD29312@shutemov.name> <4E89A846.1010200@parallels.com> <20111003122511.GA29982@shutemov.name> In-Reply-To: <20111003122511.GA29982@shutemov.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, gthelen@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, avagin@parallels.com On 10/03/2011 04:25 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:19:18PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: >> On 10/03/2011 04:14 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:18:42PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: >>>> This patch introduces kmem.tcp_current_memory file, living in the >>>> kmem_cgroup filesystem. It is a simple read-only file that displays the >>>> amount of kernel memory currently consumed by the cgroup. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa >>>> CC: David S. Miller >>>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa >>>> CC: Eric W. Biederman >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt | 1 + >>>> mm/memcontrol.c | 11 +++++++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt >>>> index 1ffde3e..f5a539d 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt >>>> +++ b/Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt >>>> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ Brief summary of control files. >>>> memory.independent_kmem_limit # select whether or not kernel memory limits are >>>> independent of user limits >>>> memory.kmem.tcp.max_memory # set/show hard limit for tcp buf memory >>>> + memory.kmem.tcp.current_memory # show current tcp buf memory allocation >>> >>> Both are in pages, right? >>> Shouldn't it be scaled to bytes and named uniform with other memcg file? >>> memory.kmem.tcp.limit_in_bytes/usage_in_bytes. >>> >> You are absolutely correct. >> Since the internal tcp comparison works, I just ended up never noticing >> this. > > Should we have failcnt and max_usage_in_bytes for tcp as well? > Well, we get a fail count from the tracer anyway, so I don't really see a need for that. I see value in having it for the slab allocation itself, but since this only controls the memory pressure framework, I think we can live without it. That said, this is not a strong opinion. I can add it if you'd prefer. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org