From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
pavel@ucw.cz, lenb@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, tj@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PM/Memory-hotplug: Avoid task freezing failures
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:52:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECA0A50.7030502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECA03DF.4000402@linux.intel.com>
On 11/21/2011 01:25 PM, Chen Gong wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Actually, I think I have a better idea based on a key observation:
>> We are trying to acquire pm_mutex here. And if we block due to this,
>> we are *100% sure* that we are not going to run as long as hibernation
>> sequence is running, since hibernation releases pm_mutex only at the
>> very end, when everything is done.
>> And this means, this task is going to be blocked for much more longer
>> than what the freezer intends to achieve. Which means, freezing and
>> thawing doesn't really make a difference to this task!
>>
>> So, let's just ask the freezer to skip freezing us!! And everything
>> will be just fine!
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> void lock_system_sleep(void)
>> {
>> /* simplified freezer_do_not_count() */
>> current->flags |= PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
>>
>> }
>>
>> void unlock_system_sleep(void)
>> {
>> mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
>>
>> /* simplified freezer_count() */
>> current->flags&= ~PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
>>
>> }
>>
>> We probably don't want the restriction that freezer_do_not_count() and
>> freezer_count() work only for userspace tasks. So I have open coded
>> the relevant parts of those functions here.
>>
>
> This new design looks clean and better than old one. I just curious how do
> you design your test environment? e.g. when hibernating is in progress,
> try to online some memories and wait for hibernation fails or succeeds?
>
Hi Chen,
Thanks a lot for taking a look!
As I have indicated earlier in some of my mails, I am more concerned about
the API lock_system_sleep() than memory hotplug, because it is this *API*
that is buggy, not memory-hotplug. And going further, any other code planning
to use this API will be problematic. So our focus here, is to fix this *API*.
So, to test this API, I have written a kernel module that calls
lock_system_sleep() in its init code. Then I load/unload that module wildly
in a loop and simultaneously run hibernation tests using the 'pm_test'
framework. It is to be also noted that, the issue here is only with the initial
steps of hibernation, namely, related to freezer. Hence, pm_test framework
fits pretty well to debug these freezer issues. (And in fact, I have found that
this method is quite effective to test whether my patch fixes the issue or not.)
Thanks,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-21 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 8:30 [PATCH v3] PM/Memory-hotplug: Avoid task freezing failures Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-19 18:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-19 19:35 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-19 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-20 6:03 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-20 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-21 4:36 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 7:55 ` Chen Gong
2011-11-21 8:22 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2011-11-21 16:40 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 17:04 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 17:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 18:01 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-21 18:12 ` [PATCH v4] PM / Memory-hotplug: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 18:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 18:25 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 22:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-21 16:47 ` [PATCH v3] PM/Memory-hotplug: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 17:12 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ECA0A50.7030502@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).