linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	pavel@ucw.cz, lenb@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, tj@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PM/Memory-hotplug: Avoid task freezing failures
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:52:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECA0A50.7030502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ECA03DF.4000402@linux.intel.com>

On 11/21/2011 01:25 PM, Chen Gong wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Actually, I think I have a better idea based on a key observation:
>> We are trying to acquire pm_mutex here. And if we block due to this,
>> we are *100% sure* that we are not going to run as long as hibernation
>> sequence is running, since hibernation releases pm_mutex only at the
>> very end, when everything is done.
>> And this means, this task is going to be blocked for much more longer
>> than what the freezer intends to achieve. Which means, freezing and
>> thawing doesn't really make a difference to this task!
>>
>> So, let's just ask the freezer to skip freezing us!! And everything
>> will be just fine!
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> void lock_system_sleep(void)
>> {
>>     /* simplified freezer_do_not_count() */
>>     current->flags |= PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
>>
>>     mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
>>
>> }
>>
>> void unlock_system_sleep(void)
>> {
>>     mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
>>
>>     /* simplified freezer_count() */
>>     current->flags&= ~PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
>>
>> }
>>
>> We probably don't want the restriction that freezer_do_not_count() and
>> freezer_count() work only for userspace tasks. So I have open coded
>> the relevant parts of those functions here.
>>
> 
> This new design looks clean and better than old one. I just curious how do
> you design your test environment? e.g. when hibernating is in progress,
> try to online some memories and wait for hibernation fails or succeeds?
> 

Hi Chen,

Thanks a lot for taking a look!

As I have indicated earlier in some of my mails, I am more concerned about
the API lock_system_sleep() than memory hotplug, because it is this *API*
that is buggy, not memory-hotplug. And going further, any other code planning
to use this API will be problematic. So our focus here, is to fix this *API*.

So, to test this API, I have written a kernel module that calls
lock_system_sleep() in its init code. Then I load/unload that module wildly
in a loop and simultaneously run hibernation tests using the 'pm_test'
framework. It is to be also noted that, the issue here is only with the initial
steps of hibernation, namely, related to freezer. Hence, pm_test framework
fits pretty well to debug these freezer issues. (And in fact, I have found that
this method is quite effective to test whether my patch fixes the issue or not.)

Thanks,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-21  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-17  8:30 [PATCH v3] PM/Memory-hotplug: Avoid task freezing failures Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-19 18:32 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-19 19:35   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-19 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-20  6:03   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-20 10:24     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-21  4:36       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21  7:55         ` Chen Gong
2011-11-21  8:22           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2011-11-21 16:40         ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 17:04           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 17:52             ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 18:01               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 20:05                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-21 18:12             ` [PATCH v4] PM / Memory-hotplug: " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 18:23               ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 18:25                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-11-21 22:41                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-21 16:47   ` [PATCH v3] PM/Memory-hotplug: " Tejun Heo
2011-11-21 17:12     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ECA0A50.7030502@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).