From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.2-rc3] cpusets: stall when updating mems_allowed for mempolicy or disjoint nodemask
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:50:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECDB10E.1080007@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111231751480.9042@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:52:08 -0800 (pst), David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Miao Xie wrote:
>
>> Memory compaction will see an empty nodemask and do nothing, and then
>> we may fail to get several contiguous pages.
>>
>
> Where do we rely on a consistent nodemask for memory compaction?
Maybe I am overcautious.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-16 21:08 [patch for-3.2-rc3] cpusets: stall when updating mems_allowed for mempolicy or disjoint nodemask David Rientjes
2011-11-17 8:29 ` Miao Xie
2011-11-17 21:33 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-18 9:52 ` Miao Xie
2011-11-18 23:49 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-23 2:51 ` Miao Xie
2011-11-23 3:32 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-23 4:48 ` Miao Xie
2011-11-23 6:25 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-23 7:49 ` Miao Xie
2011-11-23 22:26 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-24 1:26 ` Miao Xie
2011-11-24 1:52 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-24 2:50 ` Miao Xie [this message]
2011-11-17 22:22 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-17 23:08 ` [patch v2 " David Rientjes
2011-11-18 0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-18 23:53 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ECDB10E.1080007@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).