* [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] mm track: RAM utilization and page replacement topics
@ 2012-01-27 17:19 Dan Magenheimer
2012-01-30 21:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-01 14:03 ` Rik van Riel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dan Magenheimer @ 2012-01-27 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lsf-pc; +Cc: linux-mm
Some (related) topics proposed for the MM track:
1) Optimizing the utilization of RAM as a resource, i.e. how do we teach the
kernel to NOT use all RAM when it doesn't really "need" it. See
http://lwn.net/Articles/475681/ (or if you don't want to read the whole
article, start with "Interestingly, ..." four paragraphs from the end).
2) RAMster now exists and works... where are the holes and what next?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=132768187222840&w=2
3) Next steps in the page replacement algorithm:
a) WasActive https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/25/300
b) readahead http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=132750980203130
4) Remaining impediments for merging frontswap
5) Page flags and 64-bit-only... what are the tradeoffs?
Thanks,
Dan Magenheimer
"Mr. Tmem"
http://lwn.net/Articles/454795/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] mm track: RAM utilization and page replacement topics
2012-01-27 17:19 [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] mm track: RAM utilization and page replacement topics Dan Magenheimer
@ 2012-01-30 21:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-01 14:03 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2012-01-30 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Magenheimer; +Cc: lsf-pc, linux-mm
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Some (related) topics proposed for the MM track:
>
> 1) Optimizing the utilization of RAM as a resource, i.e. how do we teach the
> kernel to NOT use all RAM when it doesn't really "need" it. See
> http://lwn.net/Articles/475681/ (or if you don't want to read the whole
> article, start with "Interestingly, ..." four paragraphs from the end).
>
> 2) RAMster now exists and works... where are the holes and what next?
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=132768187222840&w=2
>
> 3) Next steps in the page replacement algorithm:
> a) WasActive https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/25/300
> b) readahead http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=132750980203130
>
> 4) Remaining impediments for merging frontswap
>
> 5) Page flags and 64-bit-only... what are the tradeoffs?
Yes, this last one is something I want to discuss too. If page_cgroup
hadn't grown so small, I'd be suggesting to squeeze some more flag bits
(or better, the node/zone info) into the 32-bit struct page lru pointers.
But with page_cgroup now ready to fit into the 64-bit struct page (which
contains an empty field from SLUB's alignment demands), it might - might -
be time to enlarge the 32-bit struct page slightly.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] mm track: RAM utilization and page replacement topics
2012-01-27 17:19 [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] mm track: RAM utilization and page replacement topics Dan Magenheimer
2012-01-30 21:01 ` Hugh Dickins
@ 2012-02-01 14:03 ` Rik van Riel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rik van Riel @ 2012-02-01 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Magenheimer; +Cc: lsf-pc, linux-mm
On 01/27/2012 12:19 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Some (related) topics proposed for the MM track:
>
> 1) Optimizing the utilization of RAM as a resource, i.e. how do we teach the
> kernel to NOT use all RAM when it doesn't really "need" it. See
> http://lwn.net/Articles/475681/ (or if you don't want to read the whole
> article, start with "Interestingly, ..." four paragraphs from the end).
>
> 2) RAMster now exists and works... where are the holes and what next?
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=132768187222840&w=2
>
> 3) Next steps in the page replacement algorithm:
> a) WasActive https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/25/300
> b) readahead http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=132750980203130
>
> 4) Remaining impediments for merging frontswap
>
> 5) Page flags and 64-bit-only... what are the tradeoffs?
I am interested in these topics.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-01 14:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-27 17:19 [LSF/MM TOPIC] [ATTEND] mm track: RAM utilization and page replacement topics Dan Magenheimer
2012-01-30 21:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-02-01 14:03 ` Rik van Riel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).