From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/21] mm: introduce lruvec locking primitives
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:23:03 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4C72C7.2000405@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120228095642.39eaab28.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:52:47 +0400
> Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org> wrote:
>
>> This is initial preparation for lru_lock splitting.
>>
>> This locking primites designed to hide splitted nature of lru_lock
>> and to avoid overhead for non-splitted lru_lock in non-memcg case.
>>
>> * Lock via lruvec reference
>>
>> lock_lruvec(lruvec, flags)
>> lock_lruvec_irq(lruvec)
>>
>> * Lock via page reference
>>
>> lock_page_lruvec(page, flags)
>> lock_page_lruvec_irq(page)
>> relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page, flags)
>> relock_page_lruvec_irq(lruvec, page)
>> __relock_page_lruvec(lruvec, page) ( lruvec != NULL, page in same zone )
>>
>> They always returns pointer to some locked lruvec, page anyway can be
>> not in lru, PageLRU() sign is stable while we hold returned lruvec lock.
>> Caller must guarantee page to lruvec reference validity.
>>
>> * Lock via page, without stable page reference
>>
>> __lock_page_lruvec_irq(&lruvec, page)
>>
>> It returns true of lruvec succesfully locked and PageLRU is set.
>> Initial lruvec can be NULL. Consequent calls must be in the same zone.
>>
>> * Unlock
>>
>> unlock_lruvec(lruvec, flags)
>> unlock_lruvec_irq(lruvec)
>>
>> * Wait
>>
>> wait_lruvec_unlock(lruvec)
>> Wait for lruvec unlock, caller must have stable reference to lruvec.
>>
>> __wait_lruvec_unlock(lruvec)
>> Wait for lruvec unlock before locking other lrulock for same page,
>> nothing if there only one possible lruvec per page.
>> Used at page-to-lruvec reference switching to stabilize PageLRU sign.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@openvz.org>
>
> O.K. I like this.
>
> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> Hmm....Could you add a comment in memcg part ? (see below)
>
>
>
>> ---
>> mm/huge_memory.c | 8 +-
>> mm/internal.h | 176 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> mm/memcontrol.c | 14 ++--
>> mm/swap.c | 58 ++++++------------
>> mm/vmscan.c | 77 ++++++++++--------------
>> 5 files changed, 237 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index 09e7069..74996b8 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -1228,13 +1228,11 @@ static int __split_huge_page_splitting(struct page *page,
>> static void __split_huge_page_refcount(struct page *page)
>> {
>> int i;
>> - struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
>> struct lruvec *lruvec;
>> int tail_count = 0;
>>
>> /* prevent PageLRU to go away from under us, and freeze lru stats */
>> - spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>> - lruvec = page_lruvec(page);
>> + lruvec = lock_page_lruvec_irq(page);
>> compound_lock(page);
>> /* complete memcg works before add pages to LRU */
>> mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(page);
>> @@ -1316,11 +1314,11 @@ static void __split_huge_page_refcount(struct page *page)
>> BUG_ON(atomic_read(&page->_count)<= 0);
>>
>> __dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_ANON_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES);
>> - __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ANON_PAGES, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>> + __mod_zone_page_state(lruvec_zone(lruvec), NR_ANON_PAGES, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>>
>> ClearPageCompound(page);
>> compound_unlock(page);
>> - spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>> + unlock_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
>>
>> for (i = 1; i< HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++) {
>> struct page *page_tail = page + i;
>> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
>> index ef49dbf..9454752 100644
>> --- a/mm/internal.h
>> +++ b/mm/internal.h
>> @@ -13,6 +13,182 @@
>>
>> #include<linux/mm.h>
>>
>> +static inline void lock_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long *flags)
>> +{
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock, *flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void lock_lruvec_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
>> +{
>> + spin_lock_irq(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void unlock_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long *flags)
>> +{
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock, *flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void unlock_lruvec_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
>> +{
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void wait_lruvec_unlock(struct lruvec *lruvec)
>> +{
>> + spin_unlock_wait(&lruvec_zone(lruvec)->lru_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
>> +
>> +/* Dynamic page to lruvec mapping */
>> +
>> +/* Lock other lruvec for other page in the same zone */
>> +static inline struct lruvec *__relock_page_lruvec(struct lruvec *locked_lruvec,
>> + struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + /* Currenyly only one lru_lock per-zone */
>> + return page_lruvec(page);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec_irq(struct lruvec *lruvec,
>> + struct page *page)
>> +{
>> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
>> +
>> + if (!lruvec) {
>> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>> + } else if (zone != lruvec_zone(lruvec)) {
>> + unlock_lruvec_irq(lruvec);
>> + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>> + }
>> + return page_lruvec(page);
>> +}
>
> Could you add comments/caution to the caller
>
> - !PageLRU(page) case ?
> - Can the caller assume page_lruvec(page) == lruvec ? If no, which lru_vec is locked ?
Yes, caller can assume page_lruvec(page) == lruvec. And PageLRU() is stable,
it means it stays true or false while this lruvec is locked.
>
> etc...
>
>
>> +
>> +static inline struct lruvec *relock_page_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec,
>> + struct page *page,
>> + unsigned long *flags)
>> +{
>> + struct zone *zone = page_zone(page);
>> +
>> + if (!lruvec) {
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, *flags);
>> + } else if (zone != lruvec_zone(lruvec)) {
>> + unlock_lruvec(lruvec, flags);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, *flags);
>> + }
>> + return page_lruvec(page);
>> +}
>
>
> Same here.
>
> Thanks,
> -Kame
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-28 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 13:51 [PATCH v3 00/21] mm: lru_lock splitting Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] memcg: unify inactive_ratio calculation Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] memcg: make mm_match_cgroup() hirarchical Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 18:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-02-23 19:46 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 22:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-02-28 0:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:31 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] memcg: fix page_referencies cgroup filter on global reclaim Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] memcg: use vm_swappiness from target memory cgroup Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] mm: rename lruvec->lists into lruvec->pages_lru Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:20 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:04 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] mm: lruvec linking functions Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:09 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] mm: add lruvec->pages_count Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:35 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:16 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] mm: unify inactive_list_is_low() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] mm: add lruvec->reclaim_stat Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] mm: kill struct mem_cgroup_zone Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] mm: move page-to-lruvec translation upper Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] mm: push lruvec into update_page_reclaim_stat() Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] mm: push lruvecs from pagevec_lru_move_fn() to iterator Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] mm: introduce lruvec locking primitives Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:23 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov [this message]
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] mm: handle lruvec relocks on lumpy reclaim Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 1:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:25 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] mm: handle lruvec relocks in compaction Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 1:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:31 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] mm: handle lruvec relock in memory controller Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 1:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] mm: add to lruvec isolated pages counters Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-24 5:32 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 1:38 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] memcg: check lru vectors emptiness in pre-destroy Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 1:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-23 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] mm: split zone->lru_lock Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-28 1:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:39 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 13:53 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] mm: zone lru vectors interleaving Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 14:44 ` Hillf Danton
2012-02-23 16:21 ` Andi Kleen
2012-02-23 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: configure lruvec split by boot options Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-23 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: show zone lruvec state in /proc/zoneinfo Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-25 0:05 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] mm: lru_lock splitting Tim Chen
2012-02-25 5:34 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-25 2:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-25 5:31 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-02-26 23:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 1:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-02-28 6:49 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4C72C7.2000405@openvz.org \
--to=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).