From: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Motohiro Kosaki <mkosaki@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] do_migrate_pages() calls migrate_to_node() even if task is already on a correct node
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:14:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6B880C.7000805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40300.1332445016@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On 03/22/2012 03:36 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:07:00 -0400, Larry Woodman said:
>
>> So to be clear on this, in that case the intention would be move 3 to 4,
>> 4 to 5 and 5 to 6
>> to keep the node ordering the same?
> Would it make more sense to do 5->6, 4->5, 3->4? If we move stuff
> from 3 to 4 before clearing the old 4 stuff out, it might get crowded?
>
Yes, I didnt try to imply the order in which pages were moved just
the additional moving necessary.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-22 18:14 [PATCH -mm] do_migrate_pages() calls migrate_to_node() even if task is already on a correct node Larry Woodman
2012-03-22 18:22 ` Rik van Riel
2012-03-22 18:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-03-22 18:47 ` Rik van Riel
2012-03-22 18:49 ` Larry Woodman
2012-03-22 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-03-22 19:07 ` Larry Woodman
2012-03-22 19:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-03-29 18:00 ` Larry Woodman
2012-03-29 19:43 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-03-29 20:01 ` Larry Woodman
2012-03-30 16:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-03-30 17:30 ` Larry Woodman
2012-03-30 20:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-03-22 19:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-03-22 19:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-03-22 20:14 ` Larry Woodman [this message]
2012-03-23 1:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2012-03-22 19:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F6B880C.7000805@redhat.com \
--to=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mkosaki@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).