linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] propagate gfp_t to page table alloc functions
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:24:32 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9A0360.3030900@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204251715420.19452@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On 04/26/2012 09:20 AM, David Rientjes wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> 
>>> Or do we instead do this:
>>>
>>> -	some_function(foo, bar, GFP_NOIO);
>>> +	old_gfp = set_current_gfp(GFP_NOIO);
>>> +	some_function(foo, bar);
>>> +	set_current_gfp(old_gfp);
>>>
>>> So the rule is "if the code was using an explicit GFP_foo then convert
>>> it to use set_current_gfp().  If the code was receiving a gfp_t
>>> variable from the caller then delete that arg".
>>>
>>> Or something like that.  It's all too hopelessly impractical to bother
>>> discussing - 20 years too late!
>>>
>>>
>>> otoh, maybe a constrained version of this could be used to address the
>>> vmalloc() problem alone.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I think it will be good start.
>>
> 
> Maybe a per-thread_info variant of gfp_allowed_mask?  So Andrew's 
> set_current_gfp() becomes set_current_gfp_allowed() that does
> 
> 	void set_current_gfp_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> 	{
> 		current->gfp_allowed = gfp_mask & gfp_allowed_mask;
> 	}
> 
> and then the page allocator does
> 
> 	gfp_mask &= current->gfp_allowed;
> 
> rather than how it currently does
> 
> 	gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask;
> 
> and then the caller of set_current_gfp_allowed() cleans up with 
> set_current_gfp_allowed(__GFP_BITS_MASK).


Caller should restore old gfp_mask instead of __GFP_BITS_MASK in case of
nesting.And how do we care of atomic context?

I was about to add warning in __vmalloc internal if caller uses GFP_NOIO, GFP_NOFS, GFP_ATOMIC
with Nick's comment and let them make to fix it. But it seems Andrew doesn't agree.

Andrew, please tell me your opinion for fixing this problem.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-27  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-23  8:55 [RFC] propagate gfp_t to page table alloc functions Minchan Kim
2012-04-24  5:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-24  5:35   ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24  6:13     ` Nick Piggin
2012-04-24  7:19       ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24  7:48         ` Nick Piggin
2012-04-24  8:01           ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24  8:05             ` Nick Piggin
2012-04-24 21:30           ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-24 23:49             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-24 23:55               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-25  0:05                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-25  0:25                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-26  0:05                     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-26  0:20                       ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27  2:24                         ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-04-27  3:08                           ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-27 10:43                           ` David Rientjes
2012-04-30  1:25                             ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-01  7:20             ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9A0360.3030900@kernel.org \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).