From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] propagate gfp_t to page table alloc functions
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:24:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9A0360.3030900@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204251715420.19452@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 04/26/2012 09:20 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2012, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
>>> Or do we instead do this:
>>>
>>> - some_function(foo, bar, GFP_NOIO);
>>> + old_gfp = set_current_gfp(GFP_NOIO);
>>> + some_function(foo, bar);
>>> + set_current_gfp(old_gfp);
>>>
>>> So the rule is "if the code was using an explicit GFP_foo then convert
>>> it to use set_current_gfp(). If the code was receiving a gfp_t
>>> variable from the caller then delete that arg".
>>>
>>> Or something like that. It's all too hopelessly impractical to bother
>>> discussing - 20 years too late!
>>>
>>>
>>> otoh, maybe a constrained version of this could be used to address the
>>> vmalloc() problem alone.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I think it will be good start.
>>
>
> Maybe a per-thread_info variant of gfp_allowed_mask? So Andrew's
> set_current_gfp() becomes set_current_gfp_allowed() that does
>
> void set_current_gfp_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> current->gfp_allowed = gfp_mask & gfp_allowed_mask;
> }
>
> and then the page allocator does
>
> gfp_mask &= current->gfp_allowed;
>
> rather than how it currently does
>
> gfp_mask &= gfp_allowed_mask;
>
> and then the caller of set_current_gfp_allowed() cleans up with
> set_current_gfp_allowed(__GFP_BITS_MASK).
Caller should restore old gfp_mask instead of __GFP_BITS_MASK in case of
nesting.And how do we care of atomic context?
I was about to add warning in __vmalloc internal if caller uses GFP_NOIO, GFP_NOFS, GFP_ATOMIC
with Nick's comment and let them make to fix it. But it seems Andrew doesn't agree.
Andrew, please tell me your opinion for fixing this problem.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-27 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 8:55 [RFC] propagate gfp_t to page table alloc functions Minchan Kim
2012-04-24 5:16 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-24 5:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24 6:13 ` Nick Piggin
2012-04-24 7:19 ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24 7:48 ` Nick Piggin
2012-04-24 8:01 ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24 8:05 ` Nick Piggin
2012-04-24 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-24 23:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-24 23:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-25 0:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-25 0:25 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-26 0:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-26 0:20 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-27 2:24 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2012-04-27 3:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-27 10:43 ` David Rientjes
2012-04-30 1:25 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-01 7:20 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F9A0360.3030900@kernel.org \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).