linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Han Ying <yinghan@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 9/9 v2] memcg: never return error at pre_destroy()
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:06:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9A375D.7@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F9A327A.6050409@jp.fujitsu.com>

When force_empty() called by ->pre_destroy(), no memory reclaim happens
and it doesn't take very long time which requires signal_pending() check.
And if we return -EINTR from pre_destroy(), cgroup.c show warning.

This patch removes signal check in force_empty(). By this, ->pre_destroy()
returns success always.

Note: check for 'cgroup is empty' remains for force_empty interface.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c    |   10 +---------
 mm/memcontrol.c |   14 +++++---------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 4dd6b39..770f1642 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1922,20 +1922,12 @@ int hugetlb_force_memcg_empty(struct cgroup *cgroup)
 	int ret = 0, idx = 0;
 
 	do {
+		/* see memcontrol.c::mem_cgroup_force_empty() */
 		if (cgroup_task_count(cgroup)
 			|| !list_empty(&cgroup->children)) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
 			goto out;
 		}
-		/*
-		 * If the task doing the cgroup_rmdir got a signal
-		 * we don't really need to loop till the hugetlb resource
-		 * usage become zero.
-		 */
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			ret = -EINTR;
-			goto out;
-		}
 		for_each_hstate(h) {
 			spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
 			list_for_each_entry(page, &h->hugepage_activelist, lru) {
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 2715223..ee350c5 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3852,8 +3852,6 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
 
 		ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EINTR)
-			break;
 
 		if (ret == -EBUSY || ret == -EINVAL) {
 			/* found lock contention or "pc" is obsolete. */
@@ -3863,7 +3861,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 			busy = NULL;
 	}
 
-	if (!ret && !list_empty(list))
+	if (!loop)
 		return -EBUSY;
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -3893,11 +3891,12 @@ static int mem_cgroup_force_empty(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, bool free_all)
 move_account:
 	do {
 		ret = -EBUSY;
+		/*
+		 * This never happens when this is called by ->pre_destroy().
+		 * But we need to take care of force_empty interface.
+		 */
 		if (cgroup_task_count(cgrp) || !list_empty(&cgrp->children))
 			goto out;
-		ret = -EINTR;
-		if (signal_pending(current))
-			goto out;
 		/* This is for making all *used* pages to be on LRU. */
 		lru_add_drain_all();
 		drain_all_stock_sync(memcg);
@@ -3918,9 +3917,6 @@ move_account:
 		}
 		mem_cgroup_end_move(memcg);
 		memcg_oom_recover(memcg);
-		/* it seems parent cgroup doesn't have enough mem */
-		if (ret == -ENOMEM)
-			goto try_to_free;
 		cond_resched();
 	/* "ret" should also be checked to ensure all lists are empty. */
 	} while (res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->res, RES_USAGE) > 0 || ret);
-- 
1.7.4.1


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-27  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-27  5:45 [RFC][PATCH 0/7 v2] memcg: prevent failure in pre_destroy() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27  5:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7 v2] temporal compile-fix in linux-next KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-30  8:47   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27  5:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7 v2] memcg: fix error code in hugetlb_force_memcg_empty() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-30  8:49   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27  5:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7 v2] res_counter: add res_counter_uncharge_until() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 17:08   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-27 23:51     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 18:18   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 23:51     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27  5:54 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7 v2] memcg: use res_counter_uncharge_until in move_parent KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 17:16   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-27 18:26     ` Ying Han
2012-04-27 20:11       ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-27 23:58     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 18:20   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 23:59     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-30  9:00   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27  5:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9 v2] move charges to root at rmdir if use_hierarchy is unset KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 19:12   ` Ying Han
2012-04-28  0:01     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-30  9:07   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-04-27  6:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9 v2] memcg: don't uncharge in mem_cgroup_move_account KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27  6:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9 v2] cgroup: avoid attaching task to a cgroup under rmdir() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 10:39   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-28  0:06     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 20:31   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:33     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27  6:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9 v2] cgroup: avoid creating new cgroup under a cgroup being destroyed KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-27 17:18   ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-27 20:40   ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 20:41     ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-28  0:20     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28  2:00       ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-28  9:31         ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 21:31           ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-27  6:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-04-27 21:28   ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9 v2] memcg: never return error at pre_destroy() Ying Han
2012-04-28  0:25     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-30 17:02       ` Ying Han
2012-05-01 22:28   ` Suleiman Souhlal
2012-05-02  3:34     ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-27 18:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7 v2] memcg: prevent failure in pre_destroy() Tejun Heo
2012-04-27 23:48   ` Hiroyuki Kamezawa
2012-04-28 16:13     ` Michal Hocko
2012-04-29  6:03       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F9A375D.7@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).