From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx170.postini.com [74.125.245.170]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF5C16B0075 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 22:27:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FD55734.60104@intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:25:56 +0800 From: Alex Shi MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] Common code 00/12] Sl[auo]b: Common functionality V2 References: <20120518161906.207356777@linux.com> In-Reply-To: <20120518161906.207356777@linux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes , Matt Mackall , Glauber Costa , Joonsoo Kim On 05/19/2012 12:19 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > V1->V2: > - Incorporate glommers feedback. > - Add 2 more patches dealing with common code in kmem_cache_destroy I tested the patchset on 3.4 kernel with hackbench process/thread: $hackbench 100 process/thread 2000 on Romely EP machine. 32 LCPUs, with 64GB memory hackbench process slub 0% hackbench thread slub 0% hackbench process slab -6.0% hackbench thread slab -0.5% on NHM EP machine, 16 cpus, with 12GB memory hackbench process slub -1.0% hackbench thread slub -1.5% hackbench process slab +1.0% hackbench thread slab +1.0% hackbench process slob 0% hackbench thread slob 0% on 4 sockets Quad-core Xeon, 16 cpus, with 16 GB memory hackbench process slub 0% hackbench thread slub 0% hackbench process slab -0.5% hackbench thread slab -0.5% hackbench process slob 0% hackbench thread slob 0% On netperf loopback, 2048 threads testing. In general, compare tcp/udp results, no clear performance change on above three machines. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org