From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] do_try_to_free_pages() might enter infinite loop
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:53:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD69302.20805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGf_=qn_f5Vm4S=X99siuQzAJcHe8vSLJzU48GXTZXLZgGuWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/11/2012 07:33 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Ying Han<yinghan@google.com> wrote:
>> This is not a patch targeted to be merged at all, but trying to understand
>> a logic in global direct reclaim.
>>
>> There is a logic in global direct reclaim where reclaim fails on priority 0
>> and zone->all_unreclaimable is not set, it will cause the direct to start over
>> from DEF_PRIORITY. In some extreme cases, we've seen the system hang which is
>> very likely caused by direct reclaim enters infinite loop.
>>
>> There have been serious patches trying to fix similar issue and the latest
>> patch has good summary of all the efforts:
>>
>> commit 929bea7c714220fc76ce3f75bef9056477c28e74
>> Author: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Date: Thu Apr 14 15:22:12 2011 -0700
>>
>> vmscan: all_unreclaimable() use zone->all_unreclaimable as a name
>>
>> Kosaki explained the problem triggered by async zone->all_unreclaimable and
>> zone->pages_scanned where the later one was being checked by direct reclaim.
>> However, after the patch, the problem remains where the setting of
>> zone->all_unreclaimable is asynchronous with zone is actually reclaimable or not.
>>
>> The zone->all_unreclaimable flag is set by kswapd by checking zone->pages_scanned in
>> zone_reclaimable(). Is that possible to have zone->all_unreclaimable == false while
>> the zone is actually unreclaimable?
>
> I'm backed very old threads. :-(
> I could reproduce this issue by using memory hotplug. Can anyone
> review following patch?
Looks like a sane approach to me.
> Reported-by: Aaditya Kumar<aaditya.kumar.30@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Ying Han<yinghan@google.com>
> Cc: Nick Piggin<npiggin@gmail.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel<riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko<mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner<hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman<mel@csn.ul.ie>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim<minchan.kim@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-12 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 20:56 [RFC PATCH] do_try_to_free_pages() might enter infinite loop Ying Han
2012-04-23 22:20 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-23 23:18 ` Ying Han
2012-04-23 23:19 ` Ying Han
2012-04-24 1:31 ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-24 2:06 ` Ying Han
2012-04-24 16:36 ` Ying Han
2012-04-24 16:38 ` Rik van Riel
2012-04-24 16:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-04-24 17:22 ` Ying Han
2012-04-24 17:17 ` Ying Han
2012-04-24 5:36 ` Nick Piggin
2012-04-24 18:37 ` Ying Han
2012-05-01 3:34 ` Nick Piggin
2012-05-01 16:18 ` Ying Han
2012-05-01 16:20 ` Ying Han
2012-05-01 17:06 ` Rik van Riel
2012-05-02 3:25 ` Nick Piggin
2012-06-11 23:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-11 23:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-06-14 5:25 ` Ying Han
2012-06-12 0:53 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD69302.20805@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).