linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] cleanup the code between tmem_obj_init and tmem_obj_find
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:49:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE0AD89.6000001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE03A55.7070503@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

This patch causes a crash, details below.

On 06/19/2012 03:37 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:

> tmem_obj_find and insertion tmem-obj have the some logic, we can integrate
> the code
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/zcache/tmem.c |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/zcache/tmem.c b/drivers/staging/zcache/tmem.c
> index 1ca66ea..cdf2d3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/zcache/tmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/zcache/tmem.c
> @@ -72,33 +72,48 @@ void tmem_register_pamops(struct tmem_pamops *m)
>   * the hashbucket lock must be held.
>   */
> 
> -/* searches for object==oid in pool, returns locked object if found */
> -static struct tmem_obj *tmem_obj_find(struct tmem_hashbucket *hb,
> -					struct tmem_oid *oidp)
> +static struct tmem_obj
> +*__tmem_obj_find(struct tmem_hashbucket*hb, struct tmem_oid *oidp,
> +		 struct rb_node *parent, struct rb_node **link)
>  {
> -	struct rb_node *rbnode;
> +	struct rb_node **rbnode;
>  	struct tmem_obj *obj;
> 
> -	rbnode = hb->obj_rb_root.rb_node;
> -	while (rbnode) {
> -		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_NODE(rbnode));
> -		obj = rb_entry(rbnode, struct tmem_obj, rb_tree_node);
> +	rbnode = &hb->obj_rb_root.rb_node;
> +	while (*rbnode) {
> +		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_NODE(*rbnode));
> +		obj = rb_entry(*rbnode, struct tmem_obj,
> +			       rb_tree_node);
>  		switch (tmem_oid_compare(oidp, &obj->oid)) {
>  		case 0: /* equal */
>  			goto out;
>  		case -1:
> -			rbnode = rbnode->rb_left;
> +			rbnode = &(*rbnode)->rb_left;
>  			break;
>  		case 1:
> -			rbnode = rbnode->rb_right;
> +			rbnode = &(*rbnode)->rb_right;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
> +
> +	if (parent)
> +		parent = &obj->rb_tree_node;
> +	if (link)
> +		link = rbnode;
> +
>  	obj = NULL;
>  out:
>  	return obj;
>  }
> 
> +
> +/* searches for object==oid in pool, returns locked object if found */
> +static struct tmem_obj *tmem_obj_find(struct tmem_hashbucket *hb,
> +					struct tmem_oid *oidp)
> +{
> +	return __tmem_obj_find(hb, oidp, NULL, NULL);
> +}
> +
>  static void tmem_pampd_destroy_all_in_obj(struct tmem_obj *);
> 
>  /* free an object that has no more pampds in it */
> @@ -131,8 +146,7 @@ static void tmem_obj_init(struct tmem_obj *obj, struct tmem_hashbucket *hb,
>  					struct tmem_oid *oidp)
>  {
>  	struct rb_root *root = &hb->obj_rb_root;
> -	struct rb_node **new = &(root->rb_node), *parent = NULL;
> -	struct tmem_obj *this;
> +	struct rb_node **new = NULL, *parent = NULL;
> 
>  	BUG_ON(pool == NULL);
>  	atomic_inc(&pool->obj_count);
> @@ -144,22 +158,10 @@ static void tmem_obj_init(struct tmem_obj *obj, struct tmem_hashbucket *hb,
>  	obj->pampd_count = 0;
>  	(*tmem_pamops.new_obj)(obj);
>  	SET_SENTINEL(obj, OBJ);
> -	while (*new) {
> -		BUG_ON(RB_EMPTY_NODE(*new));
> -		this = rb_entry(*new, struct tmem_obj, rb_tree_node);
> -		parent = *new;
> -		switch (tmem_oid_compare(oidp, &this->oid)) {
> -		case 0:
> -			BUG(); /* already present; should never happen! */
> -			break;
> -		case -1:
> -			new = &(*new)->rb_left;
> -			break;
> -		case 1:
> -			new = &(*new)->rb_right;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -	}
> +
> +	if (__tmem_obj_find(hb, oidp, parent, new))
> +		BUG();
> +
>  	rb_link_node(&obj->rb_tree_node, parent, new);


Getting a NULL deref crash here because new is NULL

[   56.422031] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
[   56.423008] IP: [<ffffffff812b8ba4>] tmem_put+0x3a4/0x3d0

static inline void rb_link_node(struct rb_node * node, struct rb_node * parent,
				struct rb_node ** rb_link)
{
...
	*rb_link = node;
ffffffff812b8ba4:	48 89 38             	mov    %rdi,(%rax) <--- here
ffffffff812b8ba7:	e8 00 00 00 00       	callq  ffffffff812b8bac <tmem_put+0x3ac>

--
Seth

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-19 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19  8:32 [PATCH 01/10] zcache: fix preemptable memory allocation in atomic context Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19  8:33 ` [PATCH 02/10] zcache: fix refcount leak Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19 14:28   ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-19 19:49     ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-19 20:06       ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-20  2:54         ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-20  3:19           ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-20 22:25             ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-21  1:44               ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19  8:33 ` [PATCH 03/10] zcache: fix a compile warning Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19 14:30   ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-20  2:55     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19  8:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] zcache: remove unnecessary check of config option dependence Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19 14:36   ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-19  8:35 ` [PATCH 05/10] zcache: mark zbud_init/zcache_comp_init as __init Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19 16:35   ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-19  8:35 ` [PATCH 06/10] zcache: cleanup zbud_init Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19  8:35 ` [PATCH 07/10] zcache: optimize zcache_do_preload Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19  8:36 ` [PATCH 08/10] zcache: cleanup zcache_do_preload and zcache_put_page Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19  8:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] zcache: introduce get_zcache_client Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19  8:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] cleanup the code between tmem_obj_init and tmem_obj_find Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19 16:49   ` Seth Jennings [this message]
2012-06-20  2:53     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-19 14:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] zcache: fix preemptable memory allocation in atomic context Seth Jennings
2012-06-20  2:51   ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-06-21 18:51 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-23  3:00   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-25 13:48     ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 14:11       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-26  7:08         ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE0AD89.6000001@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).