From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Han Ying <yinghan@google.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3][0/6] memcg: prevent -ENOMEM in pre_destroy()
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:33:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEC16EF.40408@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627175818.GM15811@google.com>
(2012/06/28 2:58), Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, KAME.
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:27:25AM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>> Remaining 20% of work is based on a modification to cgroup layer
>>
>> How do you think this patch ? (This patch is not tested yet...so
>> may have troubles...) I think callers of pre_destory() is not so many...
>>
>> ==
>> From a28db946f91f3509d25779e8c5db249506cc4b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:38:38 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: keep cgroup_mutex() while calling ->pre_destroy()
>>
>> In past, memcg's pre_destroy() was verrry slow because of the possibility
>> of page reclaiming in it. So, cgroup_mutex() was released before calling
>> pre_destroy() callbacks. Now, it's enough fast. memcg just scans the list
>> and move pages to other cgroup, no memory reclaim happens.
>> Then, we can keep cgroup_mutex() there.
>>
>> By holding looks, we can avoid following cases
>> 1. new task is attached while rmdir().
>> 2. new child cgroup is created while rmdir()
>> 3. new task is attached to cgroup and removed from cgroup before
>> checking css's count. So, ->destroy() will be called even if
>> some trashes by the task remains
>>
>> (3. is terrible case...even if I think it will not happen in real world..)
>
> Ooh, once memcg drops the __DEPRECATED_clear_css_refs, cgroup_rmdir()
> will mark the cgroup dead before start calling pre_destroy() and none
> of the above will happen.
>
Hm, threads which touches memcg should hold memcg's reference count rather than css.
Right ? IIUC, one of reason is a reference from kswapd etc...hm. I'll check it.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-28 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-11 9:41 [PATCH v3][0/6] memcg: prevent -ENOMEM in pre_destroy() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] memcg: fix error code in hugetlb_force_memcg_empty() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-14 1:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 18:15 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-14 18:32 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 1:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-15 15:12 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-11 9:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] add res_counter_uncharge_until() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-14 1:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 10:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-05-14 10:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 10:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-05-14 18:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-11 9:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] memcg: use res_counter_uncharge_until in move_parent() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 9:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] memcg: move charges to root cgroup if use_hierarchy=0 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 20:14 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 0:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 9:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] memcg: don't uncharge in mem_cgroup_move_account KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 9:53 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] remove __must_check for res_counter_charge_nofail() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 20:09 ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15 0:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-06-21 20:20 ` [PATCH v3][0/6] memcg: prevent -ENOMEM in pre_destroy() Tejun Heo
2012-06-21 23:27 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-27 17:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-28 8:33 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-06-28 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FEC16EF.40408@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).