linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Han Ying <yinghan@google.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3][0/6] memcg: prevent -ENOMEM in pre_destroy()
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:33:51 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEC16EF.40408@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627175818.GM15811@google.com>

(2012/06/28 2:58), Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, KAME.
>
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 08:27:25AM +0900, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote:
>> Remaining 20% of work is based on a modification to cgroup layer
>>
>> How do you think this patch ? (This patch is not tested yet...so
>> may have troubles...) I think callers of pre_destory() is not so many...
>>
>> ==
>>  From a28db946f91f3509d25779e8c5db249506cc4b07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:38:38 +0900
>> Subject: [PATCH] cgroup: keep cgroup_mutex() while calling ->pre_destroy()
>>
>> In past, memcg's pre_destroy() was verrry slow because of the possibility
>> of page reclaiming in it. So, cgroup_mutex() was released before calling
>> pre_destroy() callbacks. Now, it's enough fast. memcg just scans the list
>> and move pages to other cgroup, no memory reclaim happens.
>> Then, we can keep cgroup_mutex() there.
>>
>> By holding looks, we can avoid following cases
>>     1. new task is attached while rmdir().
>>     2. new child cgroup is created while rmdir()
>>     3. new task is attached to cgroup and removed from cgroup before
>>        checking css's count. So, ->destroy() will be called even if
>>        some trashes by the task remains
>>
>> (3. is terrible case...even if I think it will not happen in real world..)
>
> Ooh, once memcg drops the __DEPRECATED_clear_css_refs, cgroup_rmdir()
> will mark the cgroup dead before start calling pre_destroy() and none
> of the above will happen.
>

Hm, threads which touches memcg should hold memcg's reference count rather than css.
Right ? IIUC, one of reason is a reference from kswapd etc...hm. I'll check it.

Thanks,
-Kame










--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-28  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-11  9:41 [PATCH v3][0/6] memcg: prevent -ENOMEM in pre_destroy() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11  9:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] memcg: fix error code in hugetlb_force_memcg_empty() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 21:17   ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-14  1:07     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 18:15   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-14 18:32     ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15  1:10       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-15 15:12         ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-11  9:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] add res_counter_uncharge_until() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11 21:19   ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-14  1:10     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 10:08       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-05-14 10:32         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 10:56           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-05-14 18:17           ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-11  9:48 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] memcg: use res_counter_uncharge_until in move_parent() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11  9:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] memcg: move charges to root cgroup if use_hierarchy=0 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 20:14   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15  0:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11  9:50 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] memcg: don't uncharge in mem_cgroup_move_account KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-11  9:53 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] remove __must_check for res_counter_charge_nofail() KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-05-14 20:09   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-15  0:02     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-06-21 20:20 ` [PATCH v3][0/6] memcg: prevent -ENOMEM in pre_destroy() Tejun Heo
2012-06-21 23:27   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-06-27 17:58     ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-28  8:33       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-06-28 16:06         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FEC16EF.40408@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyuki@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).