From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx141.postini.com [74.125.245.141]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15DAF6B0062 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 00:25:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FF12284.4040109@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:24:36 -0400 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/40] autonuma: make khugepaged pte_numa aware References: <1340888180-15355-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> <1340888180-15355-29-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1340888180-15355-29-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Hillf Danton , Dan Smith , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner , Suresh Siddha , Mike Galbraith , "Paul E. McKenney" , Lai Jiangshan , Bharata B Rao , Lee Schermerhorn , Johannes Weiner , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Christoph Lameter , Alex Shi , Mauricio Faria de Oliveira , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Don Morris , Benjamin Herrenschmidt On 06/28/2012 08:56 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > If any of the ptes that khugepaged is collapsing was a pte_numa, the > resulting trans huge pmd will be a pmd_numa too. Why? If some of the ptes already got faulted in and made really resident again, why do you want to incur a new NUMA fault on the newly collapsed hugepage? Is there something on we should know about? If so, could you document it? -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org