From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel-team@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] fs: turn inode ctime fields into a single ktime_t
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 11:58:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ec1fbdc6568e16da40f41789081805e764fd83e.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZoQY4jdTc5dHPGGG@infradead.org>
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 08:12 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 08:21:42AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Many of the existing callers of inode_ctime_to_ts are in void
> > return
> > functions. They're just copying data from an internal
> > representation to
> > struct inode and assume it always succeeds. For those we'll
> > probably
> > have to catch bad ctime values earlier.
> >
> > So, I think I'll probably have to roll bespoke error handling in
> > all of
> > the relevant filesystems if we go this route. There are also
> > differences between filesystems -- does it make sense to refuse to
> > load
> > an inode with a bogus ctime on NFS or AFS? Probably not.
> >
> > Hell, it may be simpler to just ditch this patch and reimplement
> > mgtimes using the nanosecond fields like the earlier versions did.
>
> Thatdoes for sure sound simpler. What is the big advantage of the
> ktime_t? Smaller size?
>
Yeah, mostly. We shrink struct inode by 8 bytes with that patch, and we
(probably) get a better cache footprint, since i_version ends up in the
same cacheline as the ctime. That's really a separate issue though, so
I'm not too worked up about dropping that patch.
As a bonus, leaving it split across separate fields means that we can
use unused bits in the nsec field for the flag, so we don't need to
sacrifice any timestamp granularity either.
I've got a draft rework that does this that I'm testing now. Assuming
it works OK, I'll resend in a few days.
Thanks for the feedback!
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-27 1:00 [PATCH 00/10] fs: multigrain timestamp redux Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 01/10] fs: turn inode ctime fields into a single ktime_t Jeff Layton
2024-07-01 22:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-07-02 0:22 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 9:56 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 10:19 ` Jan Kara
2024-07-02 11:42 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-02 11:44 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 12:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 12:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 12:21 ` Jeff Layton
2024-07-02 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 15:58 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2024-07-03 5:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-03 5:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-02 16:18 ` Christian Brauner
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 02/10] fs: uninline inode_get_ctime and inode_set_ctime_to_ts Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 03/10] fs: tracepoints for inode_needs_update_time " Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 15:02 ` Chuck Lever
2024-06-27 15:35 ` Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 05/10] fs: add percpu counters to count fine vs. coarse timestamps Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 06/10] fs: have setattr_copy handle multigrain timestamps appropriately Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: switch to multigrain timestamps Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: " Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 09/10] btrfs: convert " Jeff Layton
2024-06-27 1:00 ` [PATCH 10/10] tmpfs: add support for " Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ec1fbdc6568e16da40f41789081805e764fd83e.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).