From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:02:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f861f07-4b47-8ddc-f783-10201ea302d3@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406070137.GC19426@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 4/6/20 12:01 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
...
> From 6c90b0a19a07c87d24ad576e69b33c6e19c2f9a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:00:56 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage
>
> It seems that the existing documentation is not explicit about the
> expected usage and potential risks enough. While it is calls out
> that users have to free memory when using this flag it is not really
> apparent that users have to careful to not deplete memory reserves
> and that they should implement some sort of throttling wrt. freeing
> process.
>
> This is partly based on Neil's explanation [1].
>
> Let's also call out that a pre allocated pool allocator should be
> considered.
>
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/877dz0yxoa.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> include/linux/gfp.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
> index e5b817cb86e7..9cacef1a3ee0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gfp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
> * the caller guarantees the allocation will allow more memory to be freed
> * very shortly e.g. process exiting or swapping. Users either should
> * be the MM or co-ordinating closely with the VM (e.g. swap over NFS).
> + * Users of this flag have to be extremely careful to not deplete the reserve
> + * completely and implement a throttling mechanism which controls the consumption
> + * of the reserve based on the amount of freed memory.
> + * Usage of a pre-allocated pool (e.g. mempool) should be always considered before
> + * using this flag.
> *
> * %__GFP_NOMEMALLOC is used to explicitly forbid access to emergency reserves.
> * This takes precedence over the %__GFP_MEMALLOC flag if both are set.
>
Hi Michal and all,
How about using approximately this wording instead? I found Neil's wording to be
especially helpful so I mixed it in. (Also fixed a couple of slight 80-col overruns.)
diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index be2754841369..c247a911d8c7 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -111,6 +111,15 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
* very shortly e.g. process exiting or swapping. Users either should
* be the MM or co-ordinating closely with the VM (e.g. swap over NFS).
*
+ * To be extra clear: users of __GFP_MEMALLOC must be working to free other
+ * memory, and that other memory needs to be freed "soon"; specifically, before
+ * the reserve is exhausted. This generally implies a throttling mechanism that
+ * balances the amount of __GFP_MEMALLOC memory used against the amount that the
+ * caller is about to free.
+ *
+ * Usage of a pre-allocated pool (e.g. mempool) should be always considered
+ * before using this flag.
+ *
* %__GFP_NOMEMALLOC is used to explicitly forbid access to emergency reserves.
* This takes precedence over the %__GFP_MEMALLOC flag if both are set.
*/
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 8:35 [PATCH 0/2] mm: few refinements to gfp flags documentation Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 19:41 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-03 21:23 ` NeilBrown
2020-04-06 7:01 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-06 19:02 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2020-04-06 23:32 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-06 23:40 ` John Hubbard
2020-04-14 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-14 3:56 ` NeilBrown
2020-04-14 19:05 ` John Hubbard
2020-04-07 1:00 ` NeilBrown
2020-04-07 1:21 ` John Hubbard
2020-04-07 7:24 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocations Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 19:41 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-07 1:38 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f861f07-4b47-8ddc-f783-10201ea302d3@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).