From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
mhocko@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlb/cgroup: Simplify pre_destroy callback
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 14:59:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5007B034.4030909@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hat4794l.fsf@skywalker.in.ibm.com>
on 2012/7/19 10:55, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:04:09 +0530
>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Since we cannot fail in hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent, we don't really
>>> need to check whether cgroup have any change left after that. Also skip
>>> those hstates for which we don't have any charge in this cgroup.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> + for_each_hstate(h) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * if we don't have any charge, skip this hstate
>>> + */
>>> + idx = hstate_index(h);
>>> + if (res_counter_read_u64(&h_cg->hugepage[idx], RES_USAGE) == 0)
>>> + continue;
>>> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>>> + list_for_each_entry(page, &h->hugepage_activelist, lru)
>>> + hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent(idx, cgroup, page);
>>> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>>> + VM_BUG_ON(res_counter_read_u64(&h_cg->hugepage[idx], RES_USAGE));
>>> + }
>>> out:
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>
>> This looks fishy.
>>
>> We test RES_USAGE before taking hugetlb_lock. What prevents some other
>> thread from increasing RES_USAGE after that test?
>>
>> After walking the list we test RES_USAGE after dropping hugetlb_lock.
>> What prevents another thread from incrementing RES_USAGE before that
>> test, triggering the BUG?
>
> IIUC core cgroup will prevent a new task getting added to the cgroup
> when we are in pre_destroy. Since we already check that the cgroup doesn't
> have any task, the RES_USAGE cannot increase in pre_destroy.
>
You're wrong here. We release cgroup_lock before calling pre_destroy and retrieve
the lock after that, so a task can be attached to the cgroup in this interval.
See 3fa59dfbc3b223f02c26593be69ce6fc9a940405 ("cgroup: fix potential deadlock in pre_destroy")
But I think the memcg->pre_destroy has been reworked and now we can safely hold
cgroup_lock when calling the callback, and this can make the code a bit simpler.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-19 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-18 5:34 [PATCH] hugetlb/cgroup: Simplify pre_destroy callback Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-07-18 7:24 ` Wanpeng Li
2012-07-18 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2012-07-19 2:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-07-19 6:59 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2012-07-19 9:41 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-07-19 10:25 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-07-19 11:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-07-19 11:42 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5007B034.4030909@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).