From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx118.postini.com [74.125.245.118]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 165CD6B007D for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:27:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <501039F9.7040309@parallels.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 22:24:57 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] slab: allow enable_cpu_cache to use preset values for its tunables References: <1343227101-14217-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1343227101-14217-6-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , David Rientjes , Pekka Enberg , Greg Thelen , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Frederic Weisbecker , devel@openvz.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg , Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Suleiman Souhlal On 07/25/2012 09:05 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > >> SLAB allows us to tune a particular cache behavior with tunables. >> When creating a new memcg cache copy, we'd like to preserve any tunables >> the parent cache already had. > > So does SLUB but I do not see a patch for that allocator. > It is certainly not through does the same method as SLAB, right ? Writing to /proc/slabinfo gives me an I/O error I assume it is something through sysfs, but schiming through the code now, I can't find any per-cache tunables. Would you mind pointing me to them? In any case, are you happy with the SLAB one, and how they are propagated? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org