From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx184.postini.com [74.125.245.184]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C42D6B0044 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:57:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <502ABB9B.90108@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:56:59 -0400 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives to balloon pages References: <20120813084123.GF14081@redhat.com> <20120814182244.GB13338@t510.redhat.com> <20120814195139.GA28870@redhat.com> <20120814195916.GC28870@redhat.com> <20120814200830.GD22133@t510.redhat.com> <20120814202401.GB28990@redhat.com> <20120814202949.GF22133@t510.redhat.com> <20120814204906.GD28990@redhat.com> <20120814205426.GA29162@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120814205426.GA29162@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Rafael Aquini , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell , Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Minchan Kim On 08/14/2012 04:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > To clarify, the global state that this patch adds, is ugly > even if we didn't support multiple balloons yet. > So I don't think I can accept such a patch. > Rusty has a final word here, maybe he thinks differently. Before deciding that "does not support multiple balloon drivers at once" is an issue, is there any use case at all for having multiple balloon drivers active at a time? I do not see any. -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org