From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx197.postini.com [74.125.245.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F6316B0069 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:42:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <503FDE96.3040702@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:43:50 -0400 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rbtree based interval tree as a prio_tree replacement References: <1344324343-3817-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com> <20120830143401.be06d61b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120830143401.be06d61b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Michel Lespinasse , peterz@infradead.org, vrajesh@umich.edu, daniel.santos@pobox.com, aarcange@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org On 08/30/2012 05:34 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > It would good to have solid acknowledgement from Rik that this approach > does indeed suit his pending vma changes. It does. Michel's rbtree rework is exactly what I need. I do not need the interval tree bits, but the faster augmented rbtree is required for my vma changes to no longer have the performance regression Johannes measured with a kernel build. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org