From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thp: move release mmap_sem lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:16:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5051A481.3090901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120912151844.a2f17f98.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 09/13/2012 06:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:56:41 +0800
> Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> To make the code more clear, move release the lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -1854,11 +1854,6 @@ static struct page
>> *hpage = alloc_hugepage_vma(khugepaged_defrag(), vma, address,
>> node, __GFP_OTHER_NODE);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> - * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> - */
>> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> if (unlikely(!*hpage)) {
>> count_vm_event(THP_COLLAPSE_ALLOC_FAILED);
>> *hpage = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> @@ -1905,7 +1900,6 @@ static struct page
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> int node)
>> {
>> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> VM_BUG_ON(!*hpage);
>> return *hpage;
>> }
>> @@ -1931,8 +1925,14 @@ static void collapse_huge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>
>> VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK);
>>
>> - /* release the mmap_sem read lock. */
>> new_page = khugepaged_alloc_page(hpage, mm, vma, address, node);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * After allocating the hugepage, release the mmap_sem read lock in
>> + * preparation for taking it in write mode.
>> + */
>> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> +
>> if (!new_page)
>> return;
>
> Well that's a pretty minor improvement: one still has to go off on a
> big hunt to locate the matching down_read().
>
> And the patch will increase mmap_sem hold times by a teeny amount. Do
> we really want to do this?
Andrew,
This is why i did in the previous patch (the lock is released in alloc function),
but as you noticed, this is really teeny overload after this patch - only increase
the load of count_vm_event() which operates a cpu-local variable. And, before i
posted this patch, i did kerbench test, no regression was found.
The another approach is, let the function name indicate the lock will be released,
how about just change the function name to khugepaged_alloc_page_release_lock?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 12:55 [PATCH 0/3] thp: tidy and fix khugepaged_prealloc_page Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] thp: fix forgetting to reset the page alloc indicator Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] thp: move release mmap_sem lock out of khugepaged_alloc_page Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-12 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-13 9:16 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-09-12 12:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] thp: introduce khugepaged_cleanup_page Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5051A481.3090901@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).