From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx199.postini.com [74.125.245.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E9AA6B005A for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 09:38:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by eaaf11 with SMTP id f11so1602611eaa.14 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 06:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <505DBF72.3000208@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:38:58 +0200 From: Sasha Levin MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] mm: add support for zsmalloc and zcache References: <1346794486-12107-1-git-send-email-sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120921161252.GV11266@suse.de> <15c1d12a-0e29-478f-97e0-ee4063e2cba5@default> <505DBDC5.3010503@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <505DBDC5.3010503@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: Mel Gorman , Seth Jennings , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Nitin Gupta , Minchan Kim , Konrad Wilk , Xiao Guangrong , Robert Jennings , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org On 09/22/2012 03:31 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 09/21/2012 09:14 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote: >>>> +#define MAX_CLIENTS 16 >>>> >>>> Seems a bit arbitrary. Why 16? >> Sasha Levin posted a patch to fix this but it was tied in to >> the proposed KVM implementation, so was never merged. >> > > My patch changed the max pools per client, not the maximum amount of clients. > That patch has already found it's way in. > > (MAX_CLIENTS does look like an arbitrary number though). btw, while we're on the subject of KVM, the implementation of tmem/kvm was blocked due to insufficient performance caused by the lack of multi-page ops/batching. Are there any plans to make it better in the future? Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org