From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@amd.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:18:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5060AB0E.3070809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120924181927.GA25762@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
On 09/24/2012 11:49 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:16:50PM +0200, Conny Seidel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:36:09 +0200
>> Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org> wrote:
>>> [ a?| ]
>>>
>>> Conny, would you test pls?
>>
>> Sure thing.
>> Out of ~25 runs I only triggered it once, without the patch the
>> trigger-rate is higher.
>>
>> [ 55.098249] Broke affinity for irq 81
>> [ 55.105108] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
>> [ 55.311216] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 1 APIC 0x11
>> [ 55.333022] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
>> [ 55.545877] smpboot: CPU 2 is now offline
>> [ 55.753050] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 2 APIC 0x12
>> [ 55.775582] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
>> [ 55.986747] smpboot: CPU 3 is now offline
>> [ 56.193839] smpboot: Booting Node 0 Processor 3 APIC 0x13
>> [ 56.212643] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
>> [ 56.423201] Got negative events: -25
>
> I see it:
>
> __percpu_counter_sum does for_each_online_cpu without doing
> get/put_online_cpus().
>
Maybe I'm missing something, but that doesn't immediately tell me
what's the exact source of the bug.. Note that there is a hotplug
callback percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback() that takes the same
fbc->lock before updating/resetting the percpu counters of offline
CPU. So, though the synchronization is a bit weird, I don't
immediately see a problematic race condition there.
And, speaking of hotplug callbacks, on a slightly different note,
I see one defined as ratelimit_handler(), which calls
writeback_set_ratelimit() for *every single* state change in the
hotplug sequence! Is that really intentional? num_online_cpus()
changes its value only -once- for every hotplug :-)
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-24 10:23 divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 10:38 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 11:13 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:34 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 11:51 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 12:29 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 12:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:54 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 14:23 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:16 ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 18:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-09-24 19:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 20:07 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 20:17 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 22:27 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-25 8:57 ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 20:48 ` [PATCH] CPU hotplug, writeback: Don't call writeback_set_ratelimit() too often during hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-28 12:27 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-28 14:46 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-10-03 23:11 ` Ni zhan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5060AB0E.3070809@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=conny.seidel@amd.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).