From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx139.postini.com [74.125.245.139]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F3E56B0044 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:03:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <506397E9.1070000@att.net> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:03:53 -0500 From: Daniel Santos Reply-To: Daniel Santos MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Please be aware that __always_inline doesn't mean "always inline"! References: <50638DCC.5040506@att.net> <20120926165044.46b8f7d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120926165044.46b8f7d6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Daniel Santos , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org On 09/26/2012 06:50 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > As I mentioned in the other thread, the __always_inline's in fs/namei.c > (at least) are doing exactly what we want them to do, so some more > investigation is needed here? Yes, definitely. When I did some tests on it (to confirm the behavior) a few months ago, it did behave as advertised. Sounds like this definitely needs more research. Thanks Andrew. Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org