From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx159.postini.com [74.125.245.159]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33DC46B005D for ; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:46:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <50698FD9.2040808@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:43:05 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management References: <1347977050-29476-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1347977050-29476-10-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20121001121553.GG8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> <50698C97.70703@parallels.com> <20121001123654.GJ8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20121001123654.GJ8622@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, devel@openvz.org, Tejun Heo , linux-mm@kvack.org, Suleiman Souhlal , Frederic Weisbecker , Mel Gorman , David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Johannes Weiner On 10/01/2012 04:36 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 01-10-12 16:29:11, Glauber Costa wrote: >> On 10/01/2012 04:15 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >>> Based on the previous discussions I guess this one will get reworked, >>> right? >>> >> >> Yes, but most of it stayed. The hierarchy part is gone, but because we >> will still have kmem pages floating around (potentially), I am still >> using the mark_dead() trick with the corresponding get when kmem_accounted. > > Is it OK if I hold on with the review of this one until the next > version? > Of course. I haven't sent it yet because I also received a lot more feedback for the slab part (which is expected), and I want to get a least part of that going before I send it again. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org