From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx174.postini.com [74.125.245.174]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3B8D6B0044 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:47:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <5077CB05.907@parallels.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:47:17 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management References: <1349690780-15988-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <1349690780-15988-10-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com> <20121011131143.GF29295@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20121011131143.GF29295@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Suleiman Souhlal , Tejun Heo , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, Johannes Weiner , Greg Thelen , devel@openvz.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg On 10/11/2012 05:11 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 08-10-12 14:06:15, Glauber Costa wrote: >> Because kmem charges can outlive the cgroup, we need to make sure that >> we won't free the memcg structure while charges are still in flight. >> For reviewing simplicity, the charge functions will issue >> mem_cgroup_get() at every charge, and mem_cgroup_put() at every >> uncharge. >> >> This can get expensive, however, and we can do better. mem_cgroup_get() >> only really needs to be issued once: when the first limit is set. In the >> same spirit, we only need to issue mem_cgroup_put() when the last charge >> is gone. >> >> We'll need an extra bit in kmem_accounted for that: KMEM_ACCOUNTED_DEAD. >> it will be set when the cgroup dies, if there are charges in the group. >> If there aren't, we can proceed right away. >> >> Our uncharge function will have to test that bit every time the charges >> drop to 0. Because that is not the likely output of >> res_counter_uncharge, this should not impose a big hit on us: it is >> certainly much better than a reference count decrease at every >> operation. >> >> [ v3: merged all lifecycle related patches in one ] >> >> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa >> CC: Kamezawa Hiroyuki >> CC: Christoph Lameter >> CC: Pekka Enberg >> CC: Michal Hocko >> CC: Johannes Weiner >> CC: Suleiman Souhlal > > OK, I like the optimization. I have just one comment to the > memcg_kmem_dead naming but other than that > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko > > [...] >> +static bool memcg_kmem_dead(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) > > The name is tricky because it doesn't tell you that it clears the flag > which made me scratch my head when reading comment in kmem_cgroup_destroy > memcg_kmem_finally_kill_that_bastard() ? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org