linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:23:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508975A4.50203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1351175972.12171.14.camel@twins>

On 10/25/2012 10:39 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 14:19 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 17:08 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>>> Ok, this looks the same but it's actually a different issue: 
>>> mpol_misplaced(), which now only exists in linux-next and not in 3.7-rc2, 
>>> calls get_vma_policy() which may take the shared policy mutex.  This 
>>> happens while holding page_table_lock from do_huge_pmd_numa_page() but 
>>> also from do_numa_page() while holding a spinlock on the ptl, which is 
>>> coming from the sched/numa branch.
>>>
>>> Is there anyway that we can avoid changing the shared policy mutex back 
>>> into a spinlock (it was converted in b22d127a39dd ["mempolicy: fix a race 
>>> in shared_policy_replace()"])?
>>>
>>> Adding Peter, Rik, and Mel to the cc. 
>>
>> Urgh, crud I totally missed that.
>>
>> So the problem is that we need to compute if the current page is placed
>> 'right' while holding pte_lock in order to avoid multiple pte_lock
>> acquisitions on the 'fast' path.
>>
>> I'll look into this in a bit, but one thing that comes to mind is having
>> both a spnilock and a mutex and require holding both for modification
>> while either one is sufficient for read.
>>
>> That would allow sp_lookup() to use the spinlock, while insert and
>> replace can hold both.
>>
>> Not sure it will work for this, need to stare at this code a little
>> more.
> 
> So I think the below should work, we hold the spinlock over both rb-tree
> modification as sp free, this makes mpol_shared_policy_lookup() which
> returns the policy with an incremented refcount work with just the
> spinlock.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> ---

It made the warnings I've reported go away.


Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-25 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-08 15:09 mpol_to_str revisited Dave Jones
2012-10-08 15:15 ` Dave Jones
2012-10-08 20:46   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:35 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-08 20:52   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-16  0:48     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-09  0:33 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-16  2:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  3:58   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16  5:10     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-16  6:10       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-16 23:39         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  0:12           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  0:31             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:38               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  1:49                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  1:53                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17  4:05               ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17  5:24                 ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17  5:42                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-17  8:49                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 19:50                       ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:05                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-17 21:27                           ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 18:14                   ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:21                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:32                       ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 19:38                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-17 19:45                           ` Dave Jones
2012-10-17 20:28                             ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when reading numa_maps David Rientjes
2012-10-17 21:31                               ` [patch for-3.7 v2] " David Rientjes
2012-10-18  4:06                                 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:14                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-18  4:41                                     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18  4:34                                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-18 20:03                                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19  8:35                                       ` [patch for-3.7 v3] mm, mempolicy: hold task->mempolicy refcount while " Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-19  9:28                                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-22  2:47                                           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-10-22 20:55                                             ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-22 20:56                                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-19 19:15                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-19  6:51                                     ` [patch for-3.7 v2] mm, mempolicy: avoid taking mutex inside spinlock when " KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-18  4:35                                   ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:30                   ` [patch for-3.7] mm, mempolicy: fix printing stack contents in numa_maps Sasha Levin
2012-10-24 23:34                     ` David Rientjes
2012-10-24 23:37                       ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-25  0:08                         ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25  0:54                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-10-25  1:15                             ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 12:19                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 14:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-25 17:23                               ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-10-25 20:22                               ` David Rientjes
2012-10-25 23:09                               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-10-26  8:48                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-10-31 18:29                                   ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-21  0:59                                     ` Sasha Levin
2012-10-17  1:33             ` mpol_to_str revisited KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508975A4.50203@gmail.com \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).