linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] memcg: synchronize per-zone iterator access by a spinlock
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:03:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A2DFDC.90402@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352820639-13521-2-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>

(2012/11/14 0:30), Michal Hocko wrote:
> per-zone per-priority iterator is aimed at coordinating concurrent
> reclaimers on the same hierarchy (or the global reclaim when all
> groups are reclaimed) so that all groups get reclaimed evenly as
> much as possible. iter->position holds the last css->id visited
> and iter->generation signals the completed tree walk (when it is
> incremented).
> Concurrent reclaimers are supposed to provide a reclaim cookie which
> holds the reclaim priority and the last generation they saw. If cookie's
> generation doesn't match the iterator's view then other concurrent
> reclaimer already did the job and the tree walk is done for that
> priority.
> 
> This scheme works nicely in most cases but it is not raceless. Two
> racing reclaimers can see the same iter->position and so bang on the
> same group. iter->generation increment is not serialized as well so a
> reclaimer can see an updated iter->position with and old generation so
> the iteration might be restarted from the root of the hierarchy.
> 
> The simplest way to fix this issue is to synchronise access to the
> iterator by a lock. This implementation uses per-zone per-priority
> spinlock which linearizes only directly racing reclaimers which use
> reclaim cookies so the effect of the new locking should be really
> minimal.
> 
> I have to note that I haven't seen this as a real issue so far. The
> primary motivation for the change is different. The following patch
> will change the way how the iterator is implemented and css->id
> iteration will be replaced cgroup generic iteration which requires
> storing mem_cgroup pointer into iterator and that requires reference
> counting and so concurrent access will be a problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>

Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-14  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-13 15:30 [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 1/5] memcg: synchronize per-zone iterator access by a spinlock Michal Hocko
2012-11-14  0:03   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 2/5] memcg: rework mem_cgroup_iter to use cgroup iterators Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 16:14   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-14  8:51     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:52       ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15  9:51         ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 14:47           ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 15:12             ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 15:31               ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 16:15                 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14  0:20   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 10:10     ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15  4:12       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15  9:52         ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-19 14:05       ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-19 15:11   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 3/5] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 4/5] memcg: clean up mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 5/5] cgroup: remove css_get_next Michal Hocko
2012-11-14  0:13 ` [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14  1:55 ` Li Zefan
2012-11-14  8:36   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:30     ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15  2:12   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 16:17 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-14  8:40   ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:41   ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15  2:44     ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-14 18:46       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A2DFDC.90402@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=yinghan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).