From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:55:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A2F9FC.5050303@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352820639-13521-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
On 2012/11/13 23:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hi all,
> this patch set tries to make mem_cgroup_iter saner in the way how it
> walks hierarchies. css->id based traversal is far from being ideal as it
> is not deterministic because it depends on the creation ordering.
>
> Diffstat looks promising but it is fair the say that the biggest cleanup is
> just css_get_next removal. The memcg code has grown a bit but I think it is
> worth the resulting outcome (the sanity ;)).
>
So memcg won't use css id at all, right? Then we can remove the whole css_id
stuff, and that's quite a bunch of code.
> The first patch fixes a potential misbehaving which I haven't seen but the
> fix is needed for the later patches anyway. We could take it alone as well
> but I do not have any bug report to base the fix on.
>
> The second patch replaces css_get_next by cgroup iterators which are
> scheduled for 3.8 in Tejun's tree and I depend on the following two patches:
> fe1e904c cgroup: implement generic child / descendant walk macros
> 7e187c6c cgroup: use rculist ops for cgroup->children
>
> The third patch is an attempt for simplification of the mem_cgroup_iter. It
> basically removes all css usages to make the code easier. The next patch
> removes the big while(!memcg) loop around the iterating logic. It could have
> been folded into #3 but I rather have the rework separate from the code
> moving noise.
>
> The last patch just removes css_get_next as there is no user for it any
> longer.
>
> I am also thinking that leaf-to-root iteration makes more sense but this
> patch is not included in the series yet because I have to think some
> more about the justification.
>
> So far I didn't get to testing but I am posting this early if everybody is
> OK with this change.
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-13 15:30 [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 1/5] memcg: synchronize per-zone iterator access by a spinlock Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 0:03 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 2/5] memcg: rework mem_cgroup_iter to use cgroup iterators Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-14 8:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 9:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 14:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 15:12 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 15:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 16:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 0:20 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 10:10 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-15 4:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-15 9:52 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-19 14:05 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-19 15:11 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 3/5] memcg: simplify mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 4/5] memcg: clean up mem_cgroup_iter Michal Hocko
2012-11-13 15:30 ` [RFC 5/5] cgroup: remove css_get_next Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 0:13 ` [RFC] rework mem_cgroup iterator Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 1:55 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2012-11-14 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:30 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 2:12 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2012-11-14 16:17 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-14 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-14 18:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-15 2:44 ` Glauber Costa
2012-11-14 18:46 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A2F9FC.5050303@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=yinghan@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).