From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx181.postini.com [74.125.245.181]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3F2F6B005D for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:22:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50A3E169.4010402@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:22:33 -0500 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/31] sched: numa: Make mempolicy home-node aware References: <1352805180-1607-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1352805180-1607-27-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1352805180-1607-27-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Andrea Arcangeli , Ingo Molnar , Johannes Weiner , Hugh Dickins , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , LKML On 11/13/2012 06:12 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > From: Peter Zijlstra > > Add another layer of fallback policy to make the home node concept > useful from a memory allocation PoV. > > This changes the mpol order to: > > - vma->vm_ops->get_policy [if applicable] > - vma->vm_policy [if applicable] > - task->mempolicy > - tsk_home_node() preferred [NEW] > - default_policy Why is the home node policy not the default policy? > Note that the tsk_home_node() policy has Migrate-on-Fault enabled to > facilitate efficient on-demand memory migration. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Paul Turner > Cc: Lee Schermerhorn > Cc: Christoph Lameter > Cc: Rik van Riel > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Linus Torvalds > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org