From: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>, Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@huawei.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages occupied by memmap
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:05:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BDCAFE.1070004@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121203151715.8c536a7a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 12/03/12 23:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 19:55:09 +0000
> Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/12 10:52, Chris Clayton wrote:
>>> On 11/28/12 23:52, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:09:46 +0800
>>>> Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation
>>>>> of pages occupied by memmap
>>>>
>>>> How are people to test this? "does it boot"?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I've been running kernels with Gerry's 5 patches applied for 11 days
>>> now. This is on a 64bit laptop but with a 32bit kernel + HIGHMEM. I
>>> joined the conversation because my laptop would not resume from suspend
>>> to disk - it either froze or rebooted. With the patches applied the
>>> laptop does successfully resume and has been stable.
>>>
>>> Since Monday, I have have been running a kernel with the patches (plus,
>>> from today, the patch you mailed yesterday) applied to 3.7rc7, without
>>> problems.
>>>
>>
>> I've been running 3.7-rc7 with the patches listed below for a week now
>> and it has been perfectly stable. In particular, my laptop will now
>> successfully resume from suspend to disk, which always failed without
>> the patches.
>>
>> From Jiang Liu:
>> 1. [RFT PATCH v2 1/5] mm: introduce new field "managed_pages" to struct zone
>> 2. [RFT PATCH v1 2/5] mm: replace zone->present_pages with
>> zone->managed_pages if appreciated
>> 3. [RFT PATCH v1 3/5] mm: set zone->present_pages to number of existing
>> pages in the zone
>> 4. [RFT PATCH v2 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages
>> occupied by memmap
>> 5. [RFT PATCH v1 5/5] mm: increase totalram_pages when free pages
>> allocated by bootmem allocator
>>
>> From Andrew Morton:
>> 6. mm-provide-more-accurate-estimation-of-pages-occupied-by-memmap.patch
>>
>> Tested-by: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
> I have only two of these five patches queued for 3.8:
> mm-introduce-new-field-managed_pages-to-struct-zone.patch and
> mm-provide-more-accurate-estimation-of-pages-occupied-by-memmap.patch.
> I don't recall what happened with the other three.
>
Gerry posted version 1 of the five patches on 18 November. Version 2 of
the first and fourth patches were posted on 21 November.
BTW, the title of Andrew's patch that I applied is wrong above. It
should be
mm-provide-more-accurate-estimation-of-pages-occupied-by-memmap-fix.
Chris
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-04 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-06 1:31 [PATCH] mm: fix a regression with HIGHMEM introduced by changeset 7f1290f2f2a4d Jiang Liu
2012-11-06 10:23 ` Chris Clayton
2012-11-06 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-14 14:52 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-15 9:22 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-15 11:28 ` Bob Liu
2012-11-15 14:23 ` Wen Congyang
2012-11-15 15:40 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-15 21:41 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-15 19:24 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-15 21:17 ` Chris Clayton
2012-11-15 21:27 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-18 16:07 ` [RFT PATCH v1 0/5] fix up inaccurate zone->present_pages Jiang Liu
2012-11-18 16:07 ` [RFT PATCH v1 1/5] mm: introduce new field "managed_pages" to struct zone Jiang Liu
2012-11-19 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-20 14:56 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-20 19:31 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-21 14:36 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-21 19:31 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-21 15:06 ` [RFT PATCH v2 " Jiang Liu
2012-11-18 16:07 ` [RFT PATCH v1 2/5] mm: replace zone->present_pages with zone->managed_pages if appreciated Jiang Liu
2012-11-18 16:07 ` [RFT PATCH v1 3/5] mm: set zone->present_pages to number of existing pages in the zone Jiang Liu
2012-11-18 16:07 ` [RFT PATCH v1 4/5] mm: provide more accurate estimation of pages occupied by memmap Jiang Liu
2012-11-19 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-20 15:18 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-20 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-21 14:52 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-21 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-22 16:17 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-21 15:09 ` [RFT PATCH v2 " Jiang Liu
2012-11-28 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2012-11-29 2:25 ` Jianguo Wu
2012-11-29 10:52 ` Chris Clayton
2012-12-02 19:55 ` Chris Clayton
2012-12-03 7:26 ` Chris Clayton
2012-12-03 23:17 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-04 1:21 ` Jiang Liu
2012-12-04 10:05 ` Chris Clayton [this message]
2012-11-20 2:15 ` [RFT PATCH v1 " Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-18 16:07 ` [RFT PATCH v1 5/5] mm: increase totalram_pages when free pages allocated by bootmem allocator Jiang Liu
2012-11-18 20:36 ` [RFT PATCH v1 0/5] fix up inaccurate zone->present_pages Chris Clayton
2012-11-22 9:23 ` Chris Clayton
2012-11-26 9:46 ` Chris Clayton
2012-11-19 21:36 ` Maciej Rutecki
2012-11-20 16:03 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-20 2:13 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-20 2:43 ` Jiang Liu
2012-11-20 3:20 ` Jaegeuk Hanse
2012-11-20 3:46 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BDCAFE.1070004@googlemail.com \
--to=chris2553@googlemail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=wujianguo@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).