From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx116.postini.com [74.125.245.116]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09EE16B006E for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:37:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50C21B3F.4030104@codeaurora.org> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 08:37:19 -0800 From: Laura Abbott MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Debugging: Keep track of page owners References: <20121205011242.09C8667F@kernel.stglabs.ibm.com> <50BF61E0.1060307@codeaurora.org> <50BF88D0.9050209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <50BF88D0.9050209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dave Hansen Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On 12/5/2012 9:48 AM, Dave Hansen wrote: >> MIGRATE_CMA pages (with CONFIG_CMA) will always have pagetype != mtype >> so CMA pages will always show up here even though they are considered >> movable pages. That's probably not what you want here. > > What do you think the the right way to handle it is? Should we just > check explicitly for CMA pages and punt on them? > That sounds like a reasonable approach to start. Laura -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org