linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add node physical memory range to sysfs
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:17:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C9F19D.8060209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50C95E4A.9010509@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

(12/12/12 11:49 PM), Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 06:03 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:48 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> But if we went and did it per-DIMM (showing which physical addresses and
>>> NUMA nodes a DIMM maps to), wouldn't that be redundant with this
>>> proposed interface?
>>
>> If DIMMs overlap between nodes, then we wouldn't have an exact range for
>> a node in question. Having both approaches would complement each other.
> 
> How is that possible?  If NUMA nodes are defined by distances from CPUs
> to memory, how could a DIMM have more than a single distance to any
> given CPU?

numa_emulation? just guess.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-13 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-07 22:34 [PATCH] mm: add node physical memory range to sysfs Davidlohr Bueso
2012-12-07 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2012-12-08  0:17   ` Dave Hansen
2012-12-13  1:18     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-12-13  1:48       ` Dave Hansen
2012-12-13  2:03         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-12-13  4:49           ` Dave Hansen
2012-12-13 15:17             ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2012-12-13 23:15             ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-12-14  0:18               ` Dave Hansen
2012-12-08 19:45 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50C9F19D.8060209@gmail.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).