linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, 695182@bugs.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:00:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F41D9D.1000403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201301120331.r0C3VxXc016220@como.maths.usyd.edu.au>

On 01/11/2013 07:31 PM, paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au wrote:
> Seems that any i386 PAE machine will go OOM just by running a few
> processes. To reproduce:
>   sh -c 'n=0; while [ $n -lt 19999 ]; do sleep 600 & ((n=n+1)); done'
> My machine has 64GB RAM. With previous OOM episodes, it seemed that
> running (booting) it with mem=32G might avoid OOM; but an OOM was
> obtained just the same, and also with lower memory:
>   Memory    sleeps to OOM       free shows total
>   (mem=64G)  5300               64447796
>   mem=32G   10200               31155512
>   mem=16G   13400               14509364
>   mem=8G    14200               6186296
>   mem=6G    15200               4105532
>   mem=4G    16400               2041364
> The machine does not run out of highmem, nor does it use any swap.

I think what you're seeing here is that, as the amount of total memory
increases, the amount of lowmem available _decreases_ due to inflation
of mem_map[] (and a few other more minor things).  The number of sleeps
you can do is bound by the number of processes, as you noticed from
ulimit.  Creating processes that don't use much memory eats a relatively
large amount of low memory.

This is a sad (and counterintuitive) fact: more RAM actually *CREATES*
RAM bottlenecks on 32-bit systems.

> On my large machine, 'free' fails to show about 2GB memory, e.g. with
> mem=16G it shows:
> 
> root@zeno:~# free -l
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:      14509364     435440   14073924          0       4068     111328
> Low:        769044     120232     648812
> High:     13740320     315208   13425112
> -/+ buffers/cache:     320044   14189320
> Swap:    134217724          0  134217724

You probably have a memory hole.  mem=16G means "give me all the memory
below the physical address at 16GB".  It does *NOT* mean, "give me
enough memory such that 'free' will show ~16G available."  If you have a
1.5GB hole below 16GB, and you do mem=16G, you'll end up with ~14.5GB
available.

The e820 map (during early boot in dmesg) or /proc/iomem will let you
locate your memory holes.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-14 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-12  3:31 [RFC] Reproducible OOM with just a few sleeps paul.szabo
2013-01-14 15:00 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2013-01-14 20:36   ` paul.szabo
2013-01-15  0:34     ` Bug#695182: " Ben Hutchings
2013-01-15  0:56     ` Dave Hansen
2013-01-15  2:16       ` paul.szabo
2013-01-30 12:51       ` Pavel Machek
2013-01-30 15:32         ` Dave Hansen
2013-01-30 19:40           ` paul.szabo
2013-01-31  5:15             ` Bug#695182: " Ben Hutchings
2013-01-31  9:07               ` paul.szabo
2013-01-31 13:38                 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-01-31 23:06                   ` paul.szabo
2013-02-01  1:07                     ` Ben Hutchings
2013-02-01  2:12                       ` paul.szabo
2013-02-01  2:57                         ` Ben Hutchings
2013-02-01  3:13                           ` paul.szabo
2013-02-01  4:38                             ` Phil Turmel
2013-02-01 10:20                               ` Pavel Machek
2013-02-01 10:25                                 ` PAE problems was " Pavel Machek
2013-02-01 16:57                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-01 17:45                                     ` Ben Hutchings
2013-02-07  0:28                                   ` Dave Hansen
2013-02-10 19:09                                     ` Pavel Machek
2013-02-17  9:10   ` Simon Jeons
2013-02-24 22:10     ` paul.szabo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-12 19:41 paul.szabo
2013-01-15 10:25 Sedat Dilek
2013-01-17 21:04 paul.szabo
2013-01-17 21:55 ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F41D9D.1000403@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=695182@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).